this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
965 points (97.3% liked)

196

17027 readers
886 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Libertarian ideology is logically solid, but it has two minor problems:

  1. It heavily depends on assumptions that never hold in real life.
  2. Any other ideology, when confronted with bad outcome predictions of their models, will try to explain why their way actually prevents these bad outcomes. Libertarianism... prefers to explain why these outcomes are actually a good thing.
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Except it isn't logically solid, because the premise is that Governing bodies cannot be expected to provide for the general welfare because humans are naturally greedy and selfish, and the solution is that we abolish all social safety nets and instead rely on voluntary charity to solve the problem of poverty...

But what voluntary charity exists if by Libertarian's own logic: Humans are too greedy and selfish to give to the poor even when they're literally mandated to do so?

[–] jessca@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It also seems to assume perfect knowledge and that all harms can be compensated for.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

The lives Brian Thompson measured in dollars were priceless to the families they said goodbye to.

Luigi, number one!

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Hence my first "minor problem". There are more such assumptions though - e.g. the assumption that you can star/stop/switch t a business/career with zero cost.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)