this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
69 points (100.0% liked)
Science
3657 readers
33 users here now
General discussions about "science" itself
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Considering how prevalent depression is I wonder how long it will be before we find out that a common processed food additive enhances the growth of Morganella morganii over other bacteria.
M. Morganii is not at fault here. It's a contaminant, DEA (diethanolamine). Good old Morgan, a normal dweller among healthy gut microbiome, only mistakes the molecules of this bitch for sugar alcohol and incorporates them in the substance it produces triggering a response in the immune system. It's all in the article.
How is it not at fault when it says its making it instead of the sugar alcohol? Its the supply for the DEA in the gut.
No, the DEA is a contaminant coming from out of the organism— it's used in many industrial processes from the oil industry to production of many consumer products, lots of them things you put on your body like soaps, cosmetics, conditioner... The contaminant molecules just happen to fit in the gap of other substance molecules and take their place, they aren't synthesized by the bacteria.
I don't understand the faulty product line and such then:
"Future research will be needed to confirm this faulty product of M. morganii as a definitive cause of major depressive disorder and to gauge what percentage of cases it may be responsible for."