cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/18727441
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
373 points (96.5% liked)
memes
12042 readers
2029 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wait, that's the graphical interpretation of the Fourier transform?
One possible way to show it. Makes sense to me
I’ve no idea what it is, so from my understanding it’s:
Changing the angle a wave is viewed from?
If that is the case, do waves have width?
It's a 90° angle for a reason.
Changing to some random angle may have sense for some theory, but it's not the Furrier transformation.
And no, the waves have 0 width. The widths on the drawing are for illustration purposes.