this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
885 points (99.7% liked)

politics

20438 readers
2654 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Twenty-one staffers from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) resigned, citing ethical concerns over dismantling public services and compromising sensitive data.

Formerly part of the U.S. Digital Service, they criticized Musk and Trump’s overhaul, which included layoffs and politically charged interviews.

Their letter warned that removing skilled technologists endangers essential services like Social Security and veterans’ benefits.

The resignations add to growing concerns over Musk’s aggressive federal cuts, amplified by his recent CPAC speech where he symbolically wielded a chainsaw against "bureaucracy."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I would love to see posts like this end up on right leaning spaces like critical posts about left leaning issues end up on left leaning spaces.

Trumps base has such a sycophant army that they just swarm spaces and post this stuff every minute of every day. But the opposite doesn't happen. Having even 100 people posting stuff like this across their space would do more than a 10 000 person protest ever could but it amazes me that 10 000 would take time off work, go stand in the rain for a week instead of shit posting effectively.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, but right leaning spaces block people critical of the right. Just look at the cesspool that is /r/conservative

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

So does left spaces but they get through by their conviction to have every random base member spread it. The left is literally asleep

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is based on the faulty liberal assumption that fascists are only fascists because they have yet to be shown all of the facts and logic.

Let's just speed run the scenario where you post this article on a right space: you post the article, every trumper comes out and says the resignations were good because the staffers were woke, and then you scratch your head wondering why your appeal to facts and logic didn't work on fascists. At this point you might just start spamming right spaces and have all your posts go directly to spam.

It's honestly kind of disturbing how you write off actual protests in favor of online activism, and I couldn't think of a more liberal take tbh. Anyone, at this stage of the game, who is taking the position of "less protests, more..." should be evaluated extremely critically - especially if your alternative is spamming r/conservative with liberal thinkpieces.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

I can't even post in r/conservative. Once I tried with my old (now banned) account to make a comment to explain quite clearly that what Americans on r/conservative thought of Canadian voter ID laws was simply not true. I couldn't even MAKE the comment. It wasn't some smarmy insult-laden attack, but a very simple and clear statement that in Canada you don't need an ID if you have someone to vouch for you, and that there are literally countless things that would qualify for an appropriate ID to use. It isn't like in some states in the US that have a very, very narrow definition of what is an acceptable ID that it rules out most forms of ID. This isn't the case in Canada (where even a utility bill can suffice).

https://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=vot&dir=ids&document=index&lang=e

Just look at what is accepted as ID in Canada. In the US they would have only a few kinds of ID that not everyone has. In Canada because of universal healthcare, EVERYONE has a healthcare card.

[–] deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

And, I forget the source, voicing your opinions online has shown to be quite useless in terms of making actual change. Will try to find the source if needed.

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

If all people did was post things online then there is no chance in hell anything would change.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Literally everything has changed with shit posting.

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

That was trumps entire campaign strategy. Dems mocked them for their online spend and now look. GamerGate, YouTube ads, Swarmfront and 4Chan have shaped the internet discourse to be right leaning on nearly every popular platform. I hate to admit it but shitposting did created change. The alt right pipeline radicalized young men into trump voters.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Be the change you want to see

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

might be a good idea to make a sub dedicated to organizing your efforts