this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)
Progressive Politics
1753 readers
858 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why wouldn't they? This isn't how it works now, but people are still scared of it.
To be clear, the first three tax brackets are at $11600, $47150, and $100526 (for a single filer), at 10%, 12% and 22% respectively. If you make $58000, the first $11600 is taxed at 10%, the next $35550 is taxed at 12%, and the remaining $10850 is taxed at 22%. (This is the exact example the IRS gives.) If you go from making $47k (the top of which falls in the 12% bracket) to $48k (the top of which falls in the 22% bracket), you're still making more money. That last $850 is just taxed at a higher rate.
Thanks for the explanation, but keep in mind that this is not only about the US. I am Portuguese, and this is a problem here, AFAIK. Nonetheless, this would simplify the tax calculation.
You obviously know better than I do, so take this with a grain of salt, but I was curious, and a quick google search turned up this source, which says:
Hmm, you are right. But this is not knowledge that is taught to us. So, the main problem is politicians limiting the information given, no?
It's not taught to us (in the US), either; in my opinion, this is the sort of thing that should be covered in the last year of primary school. There's so many general things you need to know to function in society as an adult that we're just expected to learn on our own.
Yeah. The little amount of financial literacy that I have, I got from experience; it was never taught to me by the school system.