this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
137 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38654 readers
86 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] madmaurice@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Intel says the rebranding “better aligns to customer requests” to simplify its processor names

But it doesn't simplify the processor name!? Instead of i5, we now have to say "core 5" or "intel core 5".

[–] SilverRetriever@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have a feeling everyone's going to end up calling them i9s anyways

[–] madmaurice@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago

Probably. The "core" name is too close to the old "Core2Duo/Quad" names anyway.

load more comments (11 replies)