this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22324 readers
98 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From the who-needs-precogs dept.:

Researchers are alleged to be using algorithms to analyse the information of thousands of people, including victims of crime, as they try to identify those at greatest risk of committing serious violent offences.

The scheme was originally called the “homicide prediction project”, but its name has been changed to “sharing data to improve risk assessment”. The Ministry of Justice hopes the project will help boost public safety but campaigners have called it “chilling and dystopian”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 17 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Germany's AfD gets a lot of publicity, but I'm betting on the UK being the next Western democracy to fall into fascism.

[–] ShotgunForFun@beehaw.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Elon supports them whole heartedly as well as the AfD. I dunno if the UK really has a specific party spewing it cuz I just kind of ignore the UK especially after Brexit. I'm sure it's multiple people with multiple parties already though.

To be fair in America you can easily predict murders... are they overly religious? Do they hit their spouse? More specifically have they choked their spouse. Next step is always murder. I can pretend I know this cuz of my degree but it's really just cuz I watch too many True Crime shows/videos.

Also you can just check if they are poor, they will end up (not pre-meditated) murdering for food or money. I guess we should say ultra-poor at this point in American life.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a bunch of "facts" that reflects your experience as a television consumer.

Religiosity does not predict odds of committing homicide. Domestic violence is indicative of higher risk, but "always" going to murder is an absurd extrapolation that isn't statistically backed up. My ex liked hitting me and throwing things at me, yet here I am.

I've no idea what you're on about with making this a class issue. Rich people are just as likely to kill their spouses; they just know how to get away with it by outsourcing.

[–] ShotgunForFun@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I think you combined both statements as one. And should come back to me when you're sober.

  1. Choking was the line I drew
  2. Poverty causes murder out of need

Two separate things champ. Have a good day. I'm really sorry you're trying to make excuses for someone assaulting you though. That's a weird hill to... die on.

I beg you to please seek help cuz it's not cool to defend someone hitting you just because YOU survived. That's called anecdotal evidence, definitely untrue in the real world. Again, I have a degree. And I would love to take this to a private conversation if you want.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

I'm not a fan of you accusing me of being altered. It's not a great look for you, either.

And I'm also not a fan of being talked down to. I'm going to leave it there, as you're making assumptions and twisting my words to make what you said somehow make sense.

[–] elfpie@beehaw.org 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Please, don't take this to a private conversation if it's not a private matter. The topic you were discussing would benefit others and being open offers the chance for someone to jump in with a unique perspective.

Now, about the way you expressed your opinion on the assault received. I don't have a degree in psychology, but I believe you shouldn't so nonchalantly analyse someone's behavior after just one interaction and you definitely shouldn't treat it with levity ("to die on"). Also, personally, I think you should only advise people to seek help when it's for their on benefit, not because you don't approve their behavior. You might have had the best intentions, but the language you use is important.

[–] ShotgunForFun@beehaw.org 1 points 5 days ago

Okay, I also... "personally" think it's fucked up to downgrade any psychical assault against a person. Which leads to death generally.

I guess I don't care about your feelings, I care about people never staying with abusive partners.

[–] ShotgunForFun@beehaw.org 2 points 6 days ago

To be fair, I said... "if you want" which obviously they don't want to. That's not healthy but that's what they chose. You can hate on my language all you want but I am just trying to help a person.

load more comments (10 replies)