this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
377 points (98.2% liked)

World News

46408 readers
2686 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (74 children)

To all those who stood up against "Genocide Joe":

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!

Know that your internet slacktivism has made a lasting difference in the world, and the JIDF thanks you for your service.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Maybe people wouldn't call him "Genocide Joe" if he hadn't backed a genocide. I always find it amazing that people blame the voters, instead of blaming the people with the power, the platform, and the money, who chose genocide over winning the election.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I always find it amazing that people blame the voters

I think people are blaming the people who didn't vote. They thought they were sending the message "I don't like genocide", but that was ignorant of them.

The message they sent was "Eh, either is fine. I'm fine with Trump or Harris. Whatever". And then they took the moral high ground for doing so.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Which I also find understandable. I disagree with non-voters, but if both choices are terrible, and fight against what you want, I understand why people wouldn't want to vote.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The proper way to communicate an opinion that "both choices are terrible" is to make your way to the polling station and either vote for something other than those two bad choices, or to decline or spoil your ballot.

Not voting says "I can't be bothered to make the effort; anything is fine".

People think it means "Give me something other than these two", but it takes more effort to communicate that message.

Political activism requires effort, and it requires effort the right way. Not voting is political inaction.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 2 points 16 hours ago

I mostly agree with you, which is why I voted 3rd party, and I still recommend that others vote. But voting can take a lot of time and effort, which most people are short on. I think a lot of people would vote, if they thought their vote counted, but with the two major parties we have, it clearly doesn't.

I see it as less of "I can't be bothered to make the effort; anything is fine", and more of "Both of you fight against what I want, why would I bother"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (69 replies)