this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
938 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

70200 readers
3623 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 1 week ago (23 children)

While I understand their position, I disagree with it.

Training AI on copyrighted data - let’s take music for example - is no different to a kid at home listening to Beatles songs all day and using that as inspiration while learning how to write songs or play an instrument.

You cant copyright a style of music, a sound, or a song structure. As long as the AI isn’t just reproducing the copyrighted content “word for word”, I don’t see what the issue is.

Does the studio ghibli artist own that style of drawing? No, because you can’t own something like that. Others are free to draw whatever they want while replicating that style.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (9 children)

if i learn a book by heart, and then go around making money by reciting it, then that's illegal. same thing.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s not what AI is doing though. A better analogy using your book example would be learning a book by heart, then going and writing a new book in that same style.

Is that illegal? No.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but that's not what they're doing when they're spitting out open source code verbatim, with no attribution or license

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

except that they regularly do. It isn't even news at this point

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 1 week ago

can you please show me some examples? Should be easy to find them based on your comment.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)