this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
720 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

70285 readers
3024 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

No, this is a correction after the CEO made very poor investments into an LLM company run by a crypto grifter that's amounted in little to no ROI. So now it's either every employee is an AI grifter or unemployed. All other projects are cost recovery to feed the spiral of enshitification.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 1 week ago (9 children)
[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The stock reflects peoples beliefs, not facts

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And if people’s beliefs are that their AI deals are good, prices will go up. That’s ROI baby!

[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No, that is not ROI, that would be growth above the normal growth for products and services. Problem being that they are just spinning normal growth as AI growth. Internally, they will not be seeing the growth realised. Billions spent and for what? A word predictor that is benchmarked at halucinating 80-90% of the time. Its simply appauling value when the content users get is wrong 80-90% of time, realised or otherwise. Utilization will be starting out high and falling off a cliff risking deepening reputational damage on the back of the thriving open source community.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where are you getting your 80-90% hallucinations figure from?

[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Recent research study I read that looked reasonable, it was posted here on lemmy. I'll try and find it when I have time and edit this post.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)