this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
110 points (99.1% liked)

Fediverse

34069 readers
736 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When an instance goes down, all of the images on it go with it. there's going to be a lot from lemm.ee, especially given its size.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Not really, it means I can't send every lemmy instance csam.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago (9 children)

no, I agree with the above user that it would be better to federate images too, for at least the following reasons:

  • redundancy: see the OP
  • privacy reasons: images loaded from other instances inform the other instance that one is viewing those images, do you trust all of them?
  • censorship reasons: some lemmy instances are blocked in my workplace and I can never look at images from them when browsing at work; others may be blocked in entire countries

If I'm not mistaken, Mastodon already does federate images to other instances, so it isn't unheard of.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 4 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I think they would need to find a way to address the problem first. Reportedly, these images have been a huge problem here on Lemmy. Several times now.

[–] Goten@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i heard its a problem, but never saw any. (im not saying its a lie)

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Same, same. I can't verify it and I probably don't want to. But I had people assure to me it happened.

[–] scytale@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That’s credit towards the admins who acted quickly. That’s why you’ll see instances defederate from an instance if their admin is not active and doesn’t take action against illegal content in a reasonable time, because it can quickly get out of hand. Now if content isn’t proxied and is always mirrored, not only will the admin have to defederate from the problem instance, but they will have to go and clean up whatever was copied on their instance as well.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I can't remember the exact details, but I believe the attackers also targeted instances? So it's not just that it happens with certain problematic instances, but everyone could have that uploaded to their media storage. And it can come from arbitrary places. I believe that adds to the problem. And it kind of requires to shut these things down for everyone. Or at least everyone except a few excellent hand-picked instances who cooperate closely, and the moderation tools actually work.

Yes, they've done an excellent job. I just wish they wouldn't have to deal with these things.

(And I also think some of the child protection agencies should finally offer some open-source tool to scan content. Afaik there are still no image classifiers or hash tables I could use for my projects.)

[–] Goten@piefed.social 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

i hope you dont think thats the only reason for defederation.

[–] scytale@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never said that was the only reason. We're talking specifically about image proxying vs mirroring in this thread.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)