this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
485 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

71717 readers
3483 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artifex@lemmy.zip 196 points 1 day ago (24 children)

On the one hand, I understand the inherent limitations of pseudonymous social media and why a corporation and even end users might benefit from authoritative user identification.

On the other hand, oh hell no.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

I don't think psudonyms are an issue, but verifying that a user is an actual person vs an AI chatbot is absolutely something that every popular social media platform will need to tackle at some point.

[–] SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hmm funny how Sam Altman is one of the few people responsible for creating that problem and now he's selling the solution to it

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 23 points 1 day ago

It's actually low-key brilliant. Start a gold rush, when you realize the gold isn't actually there, pivot to selling shovels and keep hyping the gold rush. Fools and their money are soon parted, and there seem to be an endless supply of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)