this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
238 points (96.9% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2989 readers
470 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 16 points 1 week ago (21 children)

Naw, we should have used 420 to ensure we can also cleanly divide by 7.

Maybe even 1260 so we can fit a division by 9 in there (420 already has 3 as a prime factor, so only need to go 420 x 3 to get a clean division by 9). I suggest ending there since we could divide by everything up to our number of fingers.

[–] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Number of fingers? Pump this numbers up. I can count to 156 using my hands and a modified Babylonian system

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

And i can count using my hands up to 1023 with the binary system :p
(gonna look into your system too, then i have more ways to count on me)

Edit: l like the babylonian system, it looks like a numpad but instead of having a row only for 0 its 10, 11 & 12
Easy to understand & remember too

[–] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My fingers aren't flexible enough for binary

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think your hands should at least be flexible enough for 4 & 132 (its one (4) or booth (4+128) middlefingers)

when i count with binary i mostly just "drag" the finger a bit forward instead of complely folding it.
Its more comfortable and faster, i really just need to understand it myself what is on or off.

[–] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I was mostly thinking about 16-23

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)