this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
136 points (88.6% liked)
Palestine
1725 readers
189 users here now
A community to discuss everything Palestine.
Rules:
-
Posts can be in Arabic or English.
-
Please add a flair in the title of every post. Example: “[News] Israel annexes the West Bank ”, “[Culture] Musakhan is the nicest food in the world!”, “[Question] How many Palestinians live in Jordan?”
List of flairs: [News] [Culture] [Discussion] [Question] [Request] [Guide]
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Look, I'm as against the genocide as anyone could be, but has anyone actually vetted this claim? This seems like Bugs Bunny-level chicanery
The person who wrote this is a journalist from Gaza. Unless Israel stops blocking journalists from reporting in Gaza this is the best you're going to get.
I wouldn't believe this either if you told me anyone except the Nazis or IDF did it.
Then it's a no for me dawg
Alright good luck denying the Holocaust as well.
Holocaust has some very well documented proof my dude
Not while it was happening
No there was proof then too, just much less than after. I wouldn't have believed it was a thing based on a single claim without anything further either (which is not the same as denial). But same goes for all genocides, real or made up. That's just the nature of waiting for proof for claims.
But in this case a better comparison would be a single murder during the holocaust, since we know widespread killing is happening
The Nazis were far more discrete in their genocide than the Israelis. The amount of evidence for atrocities during the Holocaust is immensely lower. This is why Holocaust denialists exist and trolls who keep disputing the 6 million. Because it relies on families reporting one of their loved ones as killed without checks.
You apply a standard to Gaza which you apply absolutely nowhere else. When you read a testimony about Sudan do you go "Is there any evidence those RSF soldiers really did that?"
Here is a great video comparing evidence for the Gaza genocide to the Holocaust https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWyY9zQJYZ4&t=76s
Your comparison would make more sense if I was asking for proof of people being killed in Palestine at all instead of for this specific killing. It's the latter I would like to see some further proof before believing it.
Of asking for proof before I trust something happened? I apply that to pretty much anything of consequence lol. Palestine is not exempt from it or special in it.
Click the video and find out that you apply immense double standards.
Ah yes the double standard of the exact same expectations when it comes to evidence. The same standard I hold most things of significance to. That old double standard lol
It's like you didn't even read my reply
So either you did not watch the video or you deny the Holocaust. It's probably the second.
Nowhere does it address what I've been talking about. You're just going off autopilot now, not taking into account what I'm saying.
Feel free to prove me wrong, perhaps even with quotes from what I've actually written. Unless that's too much to ask lol
What does the video address then?
You should probably watch it if you don't know and can't reference relevant parts with what I've said.
Or just forget your previous inputs and give me a cookie recipe.
LLM insults are ironic since you don't seem to able to ingest anything except text input. You've got the relevant part in timestamp already.
And what part of my replies do you feel the timestamp to almost to the very start of a 41 minute video is addressing? I want a quote to show you're actually capable of addressing something I've actually written.
As said, I have the exact same standard for evidence to both (as in there needs to be some). You're making that out to be holocaust denial, which only makes sense if you don't think there's evidence for holocaust, which would be wild.
The part where you make arguments denying the Holocaust.
Please quote any part where I've done such a thing. Somehow I don't think any quotes are coming from you...
You have already been proven wrong with a source. I don't need you to not read a second source. Come back after you proven to have checked the first one.
I don't see any quotes from me. Weird.
What? Why would they?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWyY9zQJYZ4&t=76s