this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
224 points (86.4% liked)

science

20058 readers
690 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

What is the definition of “processed” here? blended meat? high salt %? specific preservatives? artificial casing?

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Also what definition of "safe".

My grandpa eats at least one burger per week and he's turning 90 next year. So obviously "safe" isn't a measure of imminent and near term death?

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree with you, but using a relative that does something unhealthy that got old to prove a point is not really scientific nor right.

We absolutely know that smoking causes cancer is a really unhealthy habit, yet we see people that smoke reach very high age. However the average smoker lives a shorter life.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

You're right, its a suboptimal example.

But I can conclude that its not so dangerous as to lead to imminent death / disability within 30 years. So how "unsafe" is eating processed meat anyway?

The article makes like you're doomed to develop colon cancer if you mom ever fed you a single bite of hamburger helper as a kid. Obviously, that's a ridiculous conclusion.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)