this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
79 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

39806 readers
79 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To paraphrase Mean Girls, "stop trying to make hydrogen happen."

For some years now, detractors of battery electric vehicles have held up hydrogen as a clean fuel panacea. That sometimes refers to hydrogen combustion engines, but more often, it's hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles, or FCEVs. Both promise motoring with only water emitted from the vehicles' exhausts. It's just that hydrogen actually kinda sucks as a fuel, and automaker Stellantis announced today that it is ending the development of its light-, medium- and heavy-duty FCEVs, which were meant to go into production later this year.

Hydrogen's main selling point is that it's faster to fill a tank with the stuff than it is to recharge a lithium-ion battery. So it's a seductive alternative that suggests a driver can keep all the convenience of their gasoline engine with none of the climate change-causing side effects.

But in reality, that's pretty far from true.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 27 points 2 weeks ago (24 children)

As noted in the article comments, not only are all of the theoretical benefits just not realized, but it's also nothing but greenwashing since hydrogen is a byproduct of fossil fuel production ("green hydrogen" seems like a pipedream.

Now if only the US wasn't slowly shooting itself in all ten toes with EV production and renewable energy policies....

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

? You can get Hydrogen through simple water electrolysis. In fact you can do it at home. That's like how 4% of all hydrogen is manufactured.

[–] Geodad@beehaw.org 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It takes more energy than it's worth.

The infrastructure isn't there, and hydrogen is more dangerous than gasoline if it leaks.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hydrogen is more dangerous than gasoline if it leaks

I'd love to see a source on that.

This Report by the US department of energy says otherwise.

[–] Geodad@beehaw.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

My chemistry lab experiment. 😅

Spicy gas go boom.

I suppose a slow leak wouldn't be that bad though. A catastrophic failure from a collision would be not great.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

I was definitely in the same camp of thinking (I mean Hindenburg etc, duh). But there's been a bunch of studies where, because hydrogen basically immediately dissappates up and away, unless you're in an extremely cramped area it's much safer in collisions and unexpected containment breaches.

Even then, it actually poses less of a threat to life because it doesn't create smoke or burn for awhile like gasoline does.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)