this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
687 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25045 readers
1895 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

So if as an American, you were to lose your documentation, unless you are lily white, you can be contained by ICE.

Be scared.

I see withholding licenses and registrations as a tactic pigs are going to use in the future.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (7 children)

No not your documentation. Your parent's documentation

[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Yeah, but also for most things requiring proof of citizenship in the US, people generally use their birth certificate or a document, like a passport or real ID, that was originally obtained with a birth certificate. If birthright citizenship is no longer a thing, how would you even provide documentation for your parents' citizenship if they aren't naturalized citizens? Can't rely on their birth certificates because that no longer matters and now I have to prove my grandparents were/are citizens to prove my parents are citizens and on and on. It doesn't even make sense.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It makes complete sense when you understand that the goal isn't to deport “illegal immigrants” (whatever that's supposed to mean), but anyone they want (and that “deport” effectively means disappear).

Your only defence is to be a member (in good standing) of their group (and only as long as you remain in good standing).

Otherwise you're fair game.

And there's nothing you can legally do about it (except leave the country before they get to you, but then you risk getting caught as you cross the border to leave), because it's intentionally impossible for you to follow the law.

[–] Narauko@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“illegal immigrants” (whatever that's supposed to mean)

Attempting to violate constitutional law through executive order is vile, and all law enforcement should be in uniform and identifiable (and held to higher standards than non-law enforcement) so I am completely against everything Trump is doing, but let's not pretend illegal immigration isn't a thing as a knee jerk in the other direction.

Illegal immigration is crossing the border without legally passing through customs to establish a legal right to be in that country, or overstaying your legal right to be there (Visa). People who are in a country illegally are rightfully subject to deportation back to wherever they are citizens. Pretending otherwise just helps more moderate people buy into the propaganda and let's the ratchet work more easily.

We are all rightly complaining about Trump violating the law, so how is it also not a problem for people to violate immigration law? This is the problem I have that leaves me stuck in the middle.

Sanctuary cities that flaunt immigration law are, while not just as bad, still bad. When Trump (lies) and says he only wants to target people here illegally who commit crimes, and a sanctuary city prevents law enforcement cooperation with ICE, that just adds to the narrative of felon illegal immigrants and then you have ICE going after those people at home and grabbing everyone around them as by catch. This only helps the Trump.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

how is it also not a problem for people to violate immigration law

Because they don't give a flying fuck about whether the people they're disappearing have violated any laws or not.

They've disappeared citizens, they've disappeared people following the legal process to immigrate, without letting them finish, they've disappeared tourists who didn't even have any intention to immigrate.

They're fascists. They don't care about the law. It's just an excuse to do what they want. Marketing to attract gullible racist idiots to their cause.

But, even if that wasn't enough, even if you don't care about their real motives, even if you don't care whether the law is good or not or how it's applied, as I said in my previous answer they're designing their new laws in such a way that it's impossible for anyone not to violate them.

Even if you were to always carry your parents' and grandparents' birth certificates on you, what about your great grandparents?

Everyone in the USA is an immigrant or a descendant of immigrants! (Sure, some got there long enough ago that they were probably the first to arrive and can therefore be called natives, but they're the wrong colour, so they don't matter and will be disappeared anyway.)

Ironically, the only people who'll be able to prove they're in the country legally (not that it matters, since, as I said, the fascists don't care) will be those with a green card, properly stamped foreign passport, or similar documents.

Making laws impossible to follow and then applying them arbitrarily to achieve their own goals and not the laws' has been standard fascist fare since fascism was invented (and, before that, standard autocratic authoritarian fare).

Watching fascists do their thing and pointing at the law and saying that their victims deserved it or should have known better is disingenuous at best, almost certainly malicious, and definitely monstrous.

And I'll finish with this:

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name Mother of Exiles.
From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.

"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips.
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

Now, I'm not an American, I don't care about American nationalism or pride, but this is what America, the USA, was supposed to be, what it was supposed to mean. A nation of immigrants, welcoming liberty seeking refugees to her shores. A beacon of freedom and democracy to which everyone could aspire.

Of course, it never really was that. But it was a nice thought.

Something is clear, though; anyone justifying the current government's actions in the name of defending America, or American ideals or culture is either extremely ignorant or an hypocrite. And they're most definitely un-American.

And I'll finish with this

Ah, no, wait, sorry, there's also this:

This is the problem I have that leaves me stuck in the middle.

There's no middle ground with fascists.

You're either actively against them, or you're part of the problem.

Maybe you're one of them, or just a useful hateful racist idiot aiding and abetting them while you wait for your turn to be disappeared for not being fascist enough, but if you're not fighting against them you're contributing to their crimes against humanity.

And if you're just a useful idiot, bear this in mind:

You won't appease them. They won't stop. They won't thank you. They won't hesitate to treat you like any other undesirable (including many who believed themselves to be part of their group). You'll end up like any other “illegal immigrant” when your turn comes.

And if they're not stopped, rest assured, it will come.

[–] Narauko@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're either actively against them, or you're part of the problem.

I'll take this whole section generously as a nebulous "you" and not you directly calling me either "one of them or a useful hateful racist".

Two things can both be wrong, it's not a zero sum game between open borders and fascist police states. Treating it as such caused the Democrats to lose some amount of support base, and did contribute to Trump getting reelected. The increase in Trump support from Hispanics and other immigrant groups was partially from resentment with treating illegal immigration as equivalent to legal immigration.

Yes, the poem on the Statue of Liberty is wonderful, and should still apply as the US is and should remain a nation of immigrants. That is not the same as having open borders for anyone and everyone, and it never has been.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Two things can both be wrong

When one of those two things is fascism, the other one is irrelevant.

The difference in magnitude between how wrong one objectively is and the other might be is so cosmically vast, that any comparison is moot.

You either stop fascism, by any means necessary, or you (and everyone else) suffers the consequences.

Again, there is no possible middle ground.

There is no possible “yes, but...”.

There are no other priorities.

There's no possible bargaining, rationalisation, justification, or argument.

Any attempt at such is either irrational or malicious, or most probably both.

When faced with an existential threat, you either do everything in your power to stop it, or you suffer its consequences, and allow everyone else to suffer them.

If you are not actively opposing fascism, you are enabling it.

You are a necessary accomplice and collaborator.

You are effectively indistinguishable from any other fascist, and equally responsible for any harm they cause.

Accept your responsibility and, if you don't like it, stop trying to justify yourself and start doing something about it.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 days ago

Thank you for so clearly explaining how an autocrat works. Dictators use the premise and facade of laws for legitimacy but never actually care to follow them. The Donvict loves autocrats like Putin and Kim. The fact that donOLD's grandfather was an immigrant is irrelevant because he's the king, er, prez or whatever, and decides that the rules are for other people and not him.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)