this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
216 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

73656 readers
4037 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] scott@lemmy.org 34 points 3 days ago (4 children)

They need to disguise their nationality not just because they can get paid more by impersonating Westerners, but due to the extensive international sanctions North Korea is under

๐Ÿค”

[โ€“] yucandu@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't get it, why the inquisitive fave?

[โ€“] scott@lemmy.org 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I just see people calling this a scam so much when sometimes it's literally just people getting a job when they're not allowed to be paid. That paired with "they pretend to be westerners so they can get paid more" like well why is it that westerners get paid more than Asians? Just a real interesting quote.

[โ€“] yucandu@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I guess because Russia and China, the countries they worked in, think Westerners can code better than North Koreans?

I don't know if I'd call it a scam so much as slavery.

The article says he worked from China, for US and European companies. Which explains both the pay difference and the concern about the sanctions.

load more comments (2 replies)