this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
13 points (93.3% liked)

Privacy

40627 readers
1022 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm looking into getting some domains for email, so I don't need to use the same few addresses for everything. In doing this, the domain name itself becomes the identity, but it's also entirely arbitrary.

What is a good method to choose domain names so that they look more or less normal? Catch all addresses can of course be detected in SMTP, but the idea is just to not look suspicious. Would anyone be comfortable sharing the constructions they use? (though not the domains themselves, for obvious reasons) Should I use subdomains for the things that can safely be correlated, (as spam defense) or is it better to only use different mailboxes on one domain?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Giblet2708@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I went to expireddomains.net and searched for ones ending in "__mail.net". Found a good, short domain that was once a regional ISP and email provider 15-20 years ago. (I still get spam for some of their old subscribers.).

I do not use subdomains for this one. Generally, I combine a simple name with a number for the mailbox name. Like "johnathan2715@zzzmail.net" if I think it needs to look like a real name, or some other word like "giraffe1238" or something like that.

It's working great.

[โ€“] spinning_disk_engineer@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Finding previously existing services is a great idea, thanks for the link. Here's hoping I don't get too much spam as a result. (but at least I can block individual customers addresses)