TechTakes

2151 readers

83 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

this seemed harsh ten years ago, but in 2025? it's quite calm and measured (deadspin.com)

submitted 4 days ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 days ago (8 children)

This writer seems to be missing the point. The point was not what HitchBOT was. By creating HitchBOT, its makers invited the world to play pretend with them: to pretend (for entertainment purposes!) that HitchBOT was a whimsical hitchhiker in need of aid, and to collectively see how far the participants in this game could get it. Destroying HitchBOT selfishly ended the game for everyone else.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If Hillary were president HitchBot would still be alive

E: followup, from wikipedia:

Smith and Zeller recreated their invention as hitchBOT 2.0 in 2019. The robot was sent to Paris, France, where it was touring about and appearing in a play, Killing Robots, by Linda Blanchet. That tour was put on hold indefinitely due to COVID-19.

As a metaphor for liberal fantasy and optimism, hitchbot was doomed to die, one way or another.

load more comments (7 replies)