this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
56 points (96.7% liked)

Europe

7430 readers
604 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago (12 children)

G-d, how the hell is “mastercard and visa are monopolies” used as a reasoning for surveillance currency?

Have Danes been visiting ECB lately?

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How is a digital euro a "surveillance currency"? Or rather, how is it worse than Visa and Mastercard?

[–] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's not worse than credit cards in that regard. But it's not better either. It is worse than the physical Euro though.

It could and should be as anonymous as cryptos can be. Otherwise the EU / national governments can stop you from buying anything they deem illegal.

As an example imagine trying to buy something from your dealer with physical bills and coins vs the digital Euro.

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cryptos are not anonymous. A currency based on an open publicly negotiated and independently verifiable transaction ledger is antithetical to anonymity.

[–] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

You can very easily tumble cryptos. You can buy them anonymously too.

The issue is not being able to trace them or link them to some wallet. The issue is with it being linkable to a person.

If you ever were active on darknet markets, you'd know you can safely buy things with crypto there, without it being linked to you as a person and leading to charges against you.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure they can stop you buying it, but they can see what you bought, or at least who got the money. While i do see your point, I'd rather have an European alternative to Visa today than the perfect digital euro in 10 years. Preventing crime is a responsibility of a nation state, so being able to track money flows is a feature, not a bug.

[–] geissi@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The digital Euro is an alternative to other digital payment methods, nobody but conspiracy theorists is talking about abolishing physical cash.

[–] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

With the lack of anonymity it's still a bad alternative.

[–] geissi@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Afaik there is an idea that would allow anonymous person-to-person offline payments.
Whether that will actually get implemented is anyone's guess. The plans aren't specific enough yet to really know any of it will get implemented.

But bank transfers, credit cards or paypal are not anonymous either so it's not like the digital euro would be worse than the status quo.

[–] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes bank transfers and credit cards aren't anonymous, but that isn't the point. The point is that a digital Euro is less anonymous than the physical Euro.

[–] geissi@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

The point is that a digital Euro is less anonymous than the physical Euro.

Again, anonymous payments are technically possible and the ECB at least claims that it wants to implement them:

An offline digital euro: cash-like privacy levels

The details of your offline digital euro payments would only be known to you and the recipient. This offline functionality would combine the convenience of digital payments with cash-like privacy levels without the need for an internet connection.

There no final technical specifications yet, so claiming that it will not be implemented is pure speculation at this point.

Also, implementing the digital Euro does not mean abolishing the physical Euro.
You can still pay with cash.
Claims that the Eu wants to take away out cash are also not backed up by any evidence.

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

This digital euro is specifically about having a single eminent control and track your money even at rest - something Visa and Mastercard would gladly sacrifices a population of a medium sized country to achieve.

load more comments (9 replies)