this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
109 points (92.2% liked)

Asklemmy

51092 readers
368 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I recently got called out for this, and rightfully so. In my case, I think it’s ADD. It’s embarrassing to admit, but many times, I start reading, a thought pops in my head, I impulsively post, then forget to read the rest of the article. Sometimes, I find myself reading a comment and voting or replying before I’ve read all of it.

My understanding is that a lot of us on Lemmy have ADD. Perhaps that’s why, for example, it’s not uncommon to see the most upvoted comment in a thread being one that completely ignores what the article actually says, or posts getting downvoted to hell when the article’s headline or initial paragraph appears to present a perspective the community disagrees with, but the overall message is actually more neutral or agreeable.

Have you noticed yourself unwittingly engaging in any of these behaviors, or am I just overlooking something due to a deficit of attention? Oh, wait, was there another post on this topic last week that I completely missed? Ha, I actually did remember to search first this time, so hopefully not. Ooh, look at that rock!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think there's also a bit of rationality behind that system, because

a) Trolls will just lie and declare an article says something it doesn't to "win" an argument or waste people's time making them read their bullshit article (usually something hosted on a website you don't want to give traffic to)

b) Some people on those forums might have tightly constrained time-frames for looking at things because they're students or they're working in a restaurant or retail shop or some other kind of closely managed service job where they can get yelled at by a supervisor for using their phone

c) There's a lot of content to get to on the internet

So, I think it's kind of a dick move to get mad at other people for not reading the article, and it's definitely a dick move to do that if you don't take the time to quote the specific part of the article they're claiming contradicts someone else