this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
60 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

10 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
 

"Microsoft's actions following... acquisition of ZeniMax speak louder than... words."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ech@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (23 children)

On the one hand, Sony is doing the same with plenty of their own games - Spider-man, Horizon, God of War, etc. This is standard in the industry at this point. On the other hand, Sony isn't gobbling up every studio it can get its hands on, let alone one as big as Activision Blizzard.

It's an interesting situation MS has gotten themselves in.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Not that Sony is worthy of any defending on our parts, but they have a recent track record of releasing their console exclusives to the PC a short while after. Of those two big conglomerates, Sony seems to be the more dedicated of the two to preserving multiplatform releases.

[–] skulblaka@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Starfield is currently available for pre-order on Steam with a release date of Sep 6. It's coming to PC as well, without requiring an Xbox storefront or Game Pass, which does make it by all definitions multiplatform. I think the specific complaint at hand here is that it's not coming to PS5, which seems kind of odd to me. Like, it's cool if it also comes to Playstation, but we know Starfield isn't coming to the Switch, for example. So why is it such a huge deal that it doesn't come to PS5? Developers can't be expected to support every platform on every game. I was mad as hell when Persona 5 wasn't on switch (they eventually released Royal on switch but this was several years later), why wasn't that a problem with the FTC? Should I be mad that Skyrim wasn't ported to my 3DS?

Personally I'm not really a fan of Call Of Duty so I wouldn't be bothered if it did just fall off the face of the earth, but I understand people are concerned about Microsoft pulling a bait and switch and making the next COD Xbox only in order to drive console sales. So why, then, is this article talking about Starfield? Also if they were going to pull that they wouldn't be bringing it to PC either because that just ruins your whole captive audience plan, and most or all of their recent AAA stuff that I know of have been multiplatform console/PC releases.

I just don't get it, I guess, is my point. Someone please explain to me what is going on here?

[–] nathris@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Morrowind only released on Xbox + PC, Oblivion released on PS3 a year late and was a shitty port, Fallout 3 was a mess.

Bethesda treating PlayStation as an afterthought predates their Microsoft acquisition by nearly two decades.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)