this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
58 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

50769 readers
602 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally, I want nothing to do with them and I'm not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I moved to the Fediverse to get away from all these corpos.

(page 3) 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Liontigerwings@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They wouldn't join. What's the point? It's not like the fediverse is currently big enough to concern them and if they did, they wouldn't want to share their users with the rest of the fediverse. If they do join, it will simply be to stomp out competition before it becomes competition. They could probably start a network and have more user than the whole fediverse in 1 week (not saying it would be sustainable).

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Singletona@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I view them embracing federation as a good thing.

I also view it as important for the instances I wish to follow to never federate with them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[โ€“] Ertebolle@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think we should let them consume Fediverse content but not create it.

If Meta proposes to let Instagram users follow people on Mastodon or whatever, that seems like a reasonable compromise - they get to keep people on their feeds viewing ads and we get more reach - but they shouldn't have the power to leave and take a large % of Fediverse content with them; if you want to make a post, you need to do so from a non-Meta-controlled instance in a non-Meta-controlled app.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Strolleypoley@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Screw meta.

[โ€“] LollerCorleone@kbin.social -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I hate the fact that for a large number of people, this will be how they will be introduced to the fediverse and their view of it will be tainted by Meta. I also dread seeing Meta spam in my federated timeline. And I also fear Meta building its own proprietary features on top of the ActivityPub protocol, making the content generated with them incompatible with independent clients, and allowing Zuck to spread his monopoly to the fediverse as well.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ