Firefox

20317 readers

178 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml

756

This is not a good look for brave. (lemm.ee)

submitted 5 months ago by Irelephant@lemm.ee to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

200 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 4) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[+] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It honestly might be true

Firefox and Brave both suck a bit in terms of privacy. They could be worse but they also could be way better.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Firefox and Brave both suck a bit in terms of privacy.

Okay, I'll bite: how does Firefox suck in terms of privacy?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The main problem is the telemetry and targeted advertising.

However, it also could have a bit better defaults from a fingerprinting resistance perspective.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

The targeted advertising happens locally in your browser. It doesn't upload your data to anywhere, so I don't see how that's relevant for privacy.

Similarly, I find it hard to imagine that they'd be able to personally identify a person from what they send in telemetry (see about:telemetry). I guess, if you install an add-on called "I'm Seymour Skinner from Springfield, USA", then they could, but even then, worst-case they know when you use the browser...

load more comments