this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
642 points (98.2% liked)

politics

20438 readers
2965 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A GOP town hall in Idaho turned violent when private security, LEAR Asset Management, forcibly removed Teresa Borrenpohl for speaking out.

The incident escalated after Borrenpohl questioned a panelist’s anti-abortion stance, leading to her being dragged out by unmarked security. Sheriff Norris, present but in plainclothes, did not intervene initially.

LEAR, known for aggressive tactics, was revealed to have been hired by the town hall organizers. Police later revoked LEAR’s city license and clarified that removing someone for speaking out is unlawful.

The incident shows rising tensions and the blurring lines between political events and private security enforcement in conservative areas.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 hours ago

Teresa Borrenpohl later told the Coeur d’Alene/Post Falls Press that, as it happened, she didn’t know if it was an arrest or a kidnapping.

Well it's good to know that if you get kidnapped plenty of people will film it happening to put online after the fact.

The general public outnumber these fascist assholes. If you see someone possibly being kidnapped by unknown assailants you look at someone beside you and say "we need to help them" and you fucking interfere.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 48 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

God damn, when the city cops say "bro, you went too far", you fuuuuuucked up.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

when the city cops say “bro, you went too far”

Said after the fact, with no one being charged with a crime.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

bro what is this, youtube? Fix your fucking title.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 18 points 22 hours ago

I dunno if it had been edited, but the current title matches the article.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think we'd all like to assume that law enforcement wouldnt let their political opinions influence the performance of their sworn duties but time and again we see this sort of thing, and theres no real way to hold them to any account or standard of professionalism at all. They are a clear danger to everyone they come into contact with, and they even have state sponsored permission to lie and deceive in their interactions with you.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not that I disagree law enforcement needs a lot of fixing, but in this case I have to clarify the facts.

This was not law enforcement, this was private security. Actual law enforcement pulled the private group's license because of this.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

Actual law enforcement pulled the private group’s license because of this.

Long after she was already removed, the damage done, and with no one from the "security" company being charged with a crime.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

An interesting note though; It was the ~~town~~ county sheriff that made first contact with her and he ordered the private security to remove her.

The sheriff so far is facing no punishment.

[–] edgesmash@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

County sheriff, not town sheriff.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 173 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The unmarked security force were from a private security firm called LEAR Asset Management, the Press reported, but Sheriff Norris “claimed no knowledge of the security personnel or who hired them.”

Wait, so the sheriff, admits that he just watched three unidentified men assault a woman in front of him, and that he has no knowledge of who they are or who hired them, and he took no action at all. If he knows nothing about them or who hired them, how would he know that they were providing security? This is brown shirts in action and the sheriff is clearly one of them. Terrifying.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He didn't just watch; he was the first to make contact with her, then commanded the private security himself 'boys get her'.

https://youtu.be/-lxu3Ff_s14

I mean, it seems pretty clear he knew exactly who they were, and he decided to look the other way, which is just as bad.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Remember, the police in the US have no duty to protect

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Police in America exist to protect the wealthy. You can trace back their origins to the bounty hunters who caught and returned escaped slaves to their masters.

If you are not wealthy, the police are not your friends.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

or to be truthful in their interactions.

And except for when you're driving, you have no responsibility to talk with them unless you're in a stop and identify state: Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Utah, and Wisconsin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

You're not required to identify yourself or talk with them unless you are formally being detained, which is about the only thing they have to tell the truth about. They are not worth talking to in any situatuion, and they are never "off duty" So they are never worth talking to after work either. They should always be ignored and interacted with as little as possible.

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Not just watched, he's the one in the video telling her she needs to leave and then had the "private security" remove her.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 137 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (22 children)

“That little girl is afraid to leave!” Bejarana called from the stage. “She spoke up and now she doesn’t want to suffer the consequences.”

What a fucking piece of shit.

Edited to add - there aren't supposed to be any consequences for speaking up. That's part of what we supposedly all value about our nation you fucking poseurs wrapped in your US flag and preamble to the constitution prints!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That's just it - these types have always loathed actual freedom. At least freedom for anyone other than themselves.

Easy Rider could be rather uneven in places, but this scene just NAILS IT:

"You represent freedom."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Gu2ouJNmXc

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s interesting, the tv news i saw about this said that the organizers said that this wasn’t a “town hall” it was a private Republican Party event, and therefore people were not allowed to interrupt and they were allowed to hire their own private security.

This article makes it sound like they are walking that initial stance back a bit.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I mean a town hall in a rural part of Idaho kind of is a republican party event....

[–] afronaut@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 3 points 15 hours ago

Did you notice that what she yelled was "is this a town hall or a lecture?" because this is what it was?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 117 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Support. But there's nothing shocking here unless you just woke up in January. The state has been dragging anti-genocide protesters out of everywhere for more than a year. Trying to kick them out of school, deport them, etc. LA wanted to hire mercenaries. Nothing new at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (11 children)

If you're anywhere, and someone in plain clothes tries to force you to do anything and they haven't identified as police, start fucking swinging, especially if it's somewhere like this where it's clear that they don't have authority. They committed assault and it's perfectly legal to defend yourself if you feel threatened. In the end, you probably still end up getting dragged out, but maybe you can break a Nazi's nose, or if your lucky and hit them in the right spot hard enough, you could kill a Nazi.

At the very least, Teresa needs to sue everyone involved. Make being a fascist at least hurt.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, it would have been nice to see them trying this shit on a woman that was well-versed in self-defense and knew their rights - maybe a few knees straight to the groin at top speed, some throat punches and some eye gouging.

I mean, it's possible it could have escalated even further, but seriously - if you have no idea who the hell is attacking you and trying to restrain you for...checks notes...speaking your mind, what other recourse do you have?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›