this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
885 points (99.7% liked)

politics

20457 readers
2600 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Twenty-one staffers from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) resigned, citing ethical concerns over dismantling public services and compromising sensitive data.

Formerly part of the U.S. Digital Service, they criticized Musk and Trump’s overhaul, which included layoffs and politically charged interviews.

Their letter warned that removing skilled technologists endangers essential services like Social Security and veterans’ benefits.

The resignations add to growing concerns over Musk’s aggressive federal cuts, amplified by his recent CPAC speech where he symbolically wielded a chainsaw against "bureaucracy."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago

More Luigi pls

[–] arc@lemm.ee 25 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I was watching an interesting video by an ex-Tesla employee who basically confirmed what we all know - Musk is operationally incompetent and loves to showboat, firing people regardless of their value to the system, piling stress and additional work onto others. And does it even when there are process improvements that would yielded the same savings (or increase profits) and preserve jobs. That's literally his own mode of operation - work people harder with the threat of firings.

And now he does the same BS with the federal government. People will die because of this.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The move fast and break shit is something that worked in the computer sector, and as an elder millenial who grew up with computers since early childhood (my family's first computer was a C64 in the 80s. I was too young to actually use it) seeing how computers have changed and exploded in power was something to behold. A mid-high end computer in 1980 was stone age junk to a mid-high computer in 1990, and the same thing from 1990 to 2000, and 2000 to 2010.

But you cannot apply the same shit to other sectors. For public services you can't expect to enter some place, fire everyone, and then think it'll be OK. It just isn't. They are services that are DESIGNED to have redundancy in order to properly work.

Take 911 emergency lines for example. I had to call 911 a few times in my life. Do you know how long the average wait time for me was? Zero seconds. Someone picked up right away. Can you imagine what hell would happen if they decided to apply regular customer service rules to a fucking 911 line? If you had to wait 5 or 10 or 15 minutes to get to someone, PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DIE. Criminals are going to be getting away with their shit far more frequently than before. They will get bolder, too, since they know that police response times will be dramatically increased. (even in the 1970s. The stopwatch gang in Canada had a system where they would get in a bank, rob the place, and be out in less than 60 seconds. The speed at which they operated made it very difficult for people and police to get there on time since most people won't even have fully processed whatever the hell was going on in that amount of time).

But that being said. I am genuinely amazed at just how successful Elon has been in enriching himself despite being a highly stupid, socially inept, and extremely inarticulate individual.

[–] arc@lemm.ee 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think it's move fast and break shit, so much as it is not thinking things through. He's a narcissist and he believes what he thinks no matter how unfiltered stupid it is and doesn't respond well to criticism. Look how he fired all of the supercharger people. Obviously the managers there told him something he didn't like and he responded like a pissy bitch. Then he had to rehire most of those people to undo the damage he himself had caused.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is true, but not everyone who starts rich is necessarily destined to become the wealthiest man on earth. I think his skill is in the fact that he not only have no scruples (what billionaire does?), but he really, really knows how to bullshit a lot of people. Like when he made Zip2 in the 90s, the website just wasn't complicated. It was nothing more than the yellow-pages online. He had a shitty computer for a server (it was the 90s. Web hosting was done very differently then) but he got a fancy looking case and lied about its capabilities to make it look like some ultra-high end machine when it was not. He was able to trick investors into thinking it was something better than it was.

He also had some genuine help from others (who are not very rich today, sadly) who rewrote the code for his barely functional site. He managed to get 20 million dollars for the whole thing. He lied and cheated his way to the site working and the sale, but it was a success.

I think it is more that he kinda understood how to get other smarter people to somehow allow him to take credit for their work, and also being at the right time and place for everything.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

See also: Thomas Edison

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

I am genuinely amazed at just how successful Elon has been in enriching himself despite being a highly stupid, socially inept, and extremely inarticulate individual.

I think starting rich is the real factor to this.

[–] JollyBrancher@lemm.ee 5 points 17 hours ago

It's really no surprise to anyone who's followed the current state of things. The Department of Government Excrement. I only hope a heinous and abhorrently-wild remainder of life to those who have cheered for the dismantling of the institution previously. I say dismantling, because most people are influenced by any end game prospect or "promises" than the actual process. If you still believed the process could somehow work, with changes rather than taking a hammer, I still think the intentions were wildly misguided at worst. However, if you truly wanted near (if not full) fascist rule, and thought it would lead to the "greater good" with what we have now, I hope you realize it will only ever be for the good of the wealthy until millions - and that especially you yourself suffer. I get that is easy to be swept up in the rhetoric. Americans are (or at least we were 10+ years ago) taught from a young age that trust and commitment to the government will lead to helping the general public. It's especially a shame that the most self-sufficient US agency (the National Park Service) was touched at all. But I guess that government handouts for exploitative employers (business tax benefits/reliefs) sounds sexier. Even if they remove chunks of the most truly efficient government entity. The DoD? Keeping the ones they love safe - even at home far from most international conflict. Civil service? It's not sexy, but if you want to truly help - or improve what the federal government offers and also learn to to better - you will be fine.

By now, hopefully a majority of people agree the most wasteful and damaging agency is the current one believing it can cut without consequence.

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Holy shit you guys are proper fucked. America went full retard

[–] Ragnor 2 points 5 hours ago

He will blame us Europeans.

[–] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You ain't seen nuthin yet!

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

That's the spirit!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In their resignation letter, the former USDS staffers recounted how they were interviewed the day after Trump’s inauguration by figures wearing White House visitors’ badges who “demonstrated limited technical ability.”

“Several of these interviewers refused to identify themselves, asked questions about political loyalty, attempted to pit colleagues against each other,” the workers, all of whom previously worked at tech companies such as Google and Amazon, recounted. “This process created significant security risks.”

Forty USDS staffers were laid off following these interviews as part of Trump and Musk’s ongoing slashing of the federal government’s workforce. Around 65 remaining workers were then incorporated into DOGE, 21 of whom have now resigned from their positions.

Well thats 44 assholes

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Or 44 minus a few people sabotaging things.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 107 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

Relevant bit from the article, because some of y'all apparently comment before reading:

The staffers who resigned were all originally employees of the United States Digital Service, a technology unit established during President Obama’s second term in 2014. The unit was renamed and reorganized in January via executive order by Trump into the Musk-headed DOGE.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 day ago

My understanding is: Founding a new Department can only be done by Congress, so they had to "redefine" (more like corrupt) an existing one.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I have seen some news sites giving this with headlines like "DOGE Goons resign" without the part you just quoted of course. top notch newsmanship

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

I would love to see posts like this end up on right leaning spaces like critical posts about left leaning issues end up on left leaning spaces.

Trumps base has such a sycophant army that they just swarm spaces and post this stuff every minute of every day. But the opposite doesn't happen. Having even 100 people posting stuff like this across their space would do more than a 10 000 person protest ever could but it amazes me that 10 000 would take time off work, go stand in the rain for a week instead of shit posting effectively.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, but right leaning spaces block people critical of the right. Just look at the cesspool that is /r/conservative

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago

Pretty much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is based on the faulty liberal assumption that fascists are only fascists because they have yet to be shown all of the facts and logic.

Let's just speed run the scenario where you post this article on a right space: you post the article, every trumper comes out and says the resignations were good because the staffers were woke, and then you scratch your head wondering why your appeal to facts and logic didn't work on fascists. At this point you might just start spamming right spaces and have all your posts go directly to spam.

It's honestly kind of disturbing how you write off actual protests in favor of online activism, and I couldn't think of a more liberal take tbh. Anyone, at this stage of the game, who is taking the position of "less protests, more..." should be evaluated extremely critically - especially if your alternative is spamming r/conservative with liberal thinkpieces.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago

I can't even post in r/conservative. Once I tried with my old (now banned) account to make a comment to explain quite clearly that what Americans on r/conservative thought of Canadian voter ID laws was simply not true. I couldn't even MAKE the comment. It wasn't some smarmy insult-laden attack, but a very simple and clear statement that in Canada you don't need an ID if you have someone to vouch for you, and that there are literally countless things that would qualify for an appropriate ID to use. It isn't like in some states in the US that have a very, very narrow definition of what is an acceptable ID that it rules out most forms of ID. This isn't the case in Canada (where even a utility bill can suffice).

https://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=vot&dir=ids&document=index&lang=e

Just look at what is accepted as ID in Canada. In the US they would have only a few kinds of ID that not everyone has. In Canada because of universal healthcare, EVERYONE has a healthcare card.

[–] deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

And, I forget the source, voicing your opinions online has shown to be quite useless in terms of making actual change. Will try to find the source if needed.

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If all people did was post things online then there is no chance in hell anything would change.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Literally everything has changed with shit posting.

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

That was trumps entire campaign strategy. Dems mocked them for their online spend and now look. GamerGate, YouTube ads, Swarmfront and 4Chan have shaped the internet discourse to be right leaning on nearly every popular platform. I hate to admit it but shitposting did created change. The alt right pipeline radicalized young men into trump voters.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 77 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Those are the ones you want to stay. They have ethics.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I thought they were just like 6 white dudes. How did they ever hire over 20 people?

[–] pogt@lemmy.wtf 4 points 18 hours ago

Original USDS employees, which Musk merged into DOGE

[–] holdstrong@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

DOGE is a restructuring of the existing US Digital Service. The people leaving are mostly people who worked there before Elon took over.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Doge is not even a real agency. As you said, it is the US digital service. The executive order Trump signed admits that Trump does not have the authority to rename an agency, and that Doge is only the "public, alternative name."

So fucking cringe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Ignoring the people who worked there previously, Elon hired more than 6 white college kids (but the media just focused on the juniors because clicks)

load more comments
view more: next ›