this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
262 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

63277 readers
4170 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hot off the back of its recent leadership rejig, Mozilla has announced users of Firefox will soon be subject to a ‘Terms of Use’ policy — a first for the iconic open source web browser.

This official Terms of Use will, Mozilla argues, offer users ‘more transparency’ over their ‘rights and permissions’ as they use Firefox to browse the information superhighway — as well well as Mozilla’s “rights” to help them do it, as this excerpt makes clear:

You give Mozilla all rights necessary to operate Firefox, including processing data as we describe in the Firefox Privacy Notice, as well as acting on your behalf to help you navigate the internet.

When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox.

Also about to go into effect is an updated privacy notice (aka privacy policy). This adds a crop of cushy caveats to cover the company’s planned AI chatbot integrations, cloud-based service features, and more ads and sponsored content on Firefox New Tab page.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 4 points 48 minutes ago

Is this because some middle manager at Mozilla has to pretend to be productive?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 minutes ago

can a chromium fork reasonably be maintained with adblock support?

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The only acceptable privacy policy for a browser is "we won't fucking look into anything, take anything, nor send anything anywhere you didn't actually wish to send explicitly".

Firefox have an extension system. If mozilla wants to bloat it, they should do it via extension, so that they're not bloating the actually useful part. As it is, all they're doing is forcing more work on people to manage forks to remove all the shit every time they push a release.

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago

Looking forward to seeing the cope from the Mozilla fanboys for that one.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Where's the gofundme for the firefox fork project?

Was this from google turning off the funding tap?

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I've been willingly enabling data collection features for Mozilla but I guess that time is revolute, they don't feel trustworthy anymore.

[–] PullPantsUnsworn@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 hour ago

Same here. Just turned off all data collection checkboxes. Fuck Mozilla!

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Wtf is happening, why is now even Firefox going off the rails?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

probably saw all the money by having thier browsers info being sold off to companies, like with chrome, and google and reddit/OPEN AI collusion.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

So now what the hell do we have to use to not be spied upon?

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

In the good/bad old days a web page was just text and images but now a browser is a platform for running software. Each website can do useful computing for the user but the software author is in control and always tempted to make it run for them at the expenve of the user.

Crazy idea, maybe we shouldn't use web browsers.

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Well I suppose LibreWolf (or some other de-branded Firefox) will become more mainstream. Similar to what chromium is to chrome 🤷

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's not a real equivalence.

Chromium is the basis for Google Chrome, while Librewolf is nothing more than a leech to Firefox. It's just Firefox, rebranded.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Rebranded, pre-cleaned of all the forced stuff from mozilla, with the built-in integration of more privacy-enhancing features.

So, not "just firefox, rebranded" at all.

[–] DominicJ@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Soon other web engine will coming, first LadyBird browser and two is Servo Browser. But they're still along way to go

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

I am still waiting desperately for a servo based browser, mozilla kicking it out was one of the reasons I lost all hope in Mozilla a while back.

[–] adub@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Am I missing something on Servo Browser? Because when I went to check it out and seems more like next-gen browser engine that looks to be an improvement on Firefox's Gecko. If so then we will need to wait for a browser team to adopt it.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Servo is also building a web browser UI.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 24 minutes ago

But isn't Servo funded by Mozilla

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

This comment under the article gave me a chuckle.

[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 26 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

does this affect forks?

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 51 points 9 hours ago

Good thing LibreWolf and other forks exist, including hard forks like the Goanna browsers.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 84 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Privacy policies should legally be called surveillance policies.

[–] visor841@lemmy.world 30 points 10 hours ago

Or "Invasion of Privacy" Policy

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 108 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, that last paragraph doesn't give me hope at all. Fucking AI chatbots.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 158 points 12 hours ago (9 children)

The actual addition to the terms is essentially this:

  1. If you choose to use the optional AI chatbot sidebar feature, you're subject to the ToS and Privacy Policy of the provider you use, just as if you'd gone to their site and used it directly. This is obvious.
  2. Mozilla will collect light data on usage, such as how frequently people use the feature overall, and how long the strings of text are that are being pasted in. That's basically it.

The way this article describes it as "cushy caveats" is completely misleading. It's quite literally just "If you use a feature that integrates with third party services, you're relying on and providing data to those services, also we want to know if the feature is actually being used and how much."

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 62 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is the inclusion of the feature to begin with. It should be an opt in add install.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 40 points 11 hours ago (12 children)

I agree to a point, but I look at this similar to how I'd view any feature in a browser. Sometimes there are features added that I don't use, and thus, I simply won't use them.

This would be a problem for me if it was an "assistant" that automatically popped up over pages I was on to offer "help," but it's not. It's just a sidebar you can click a button in the menu to pop out, or you can never click that button and you'll never have to look at it.

It's not a feature that auto-enables in a way that actually starts sending data to any AI company, it's just an optional interface, that you have to click a specific button to open, that can then interface with a given AI model if you choose to use it. If you don't want to use it, then you ideally won't even see it open during your use of Firefox.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 31 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (4 children)

Overhyped AI is going to fail, and it can't happen soon enough. The Mozilla leadership really needs to pay attention to that reality.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

i think MS? admitted AI isnt generating useful profit for them, yea its hype like crypto is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 33 points 11 hours ago (13 children)

Well, we had a good run lads, enshitification is here.

Any recommendations for open source alternatives that are convenient and also have an android app supporting ublock origin.

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Not really open source, but want to mention it anyways. Take a look at the Norwegian browser Vivaldi. I made the switch recently and am really happy with it. Their privacy policy seems good, and they have a clear no AI stance. Their android browser is by far the best android browser from a UX standpoint in my opinion.

I might be biased as a Norwegian 😉

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

Mange tak! 😁

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, I'll +1 Vivaldi - great tool with (mostly) useful features

Not sure how it will do with the Chrome / Chromium v3 addon API thingie - just not looked into that at all. Hope it's not relevant

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›