this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
552 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

63313 readers
4609 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 132 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

It's super funny to me that they named it "WanX" haha

mind-blowing

Hmm, it's certainly blowing something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hmmm@sh.itjust.works 21 points 14 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Arda1@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

I dont like that i was able to tell

[–] whalebiologist@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

fucking saw it too 😅

[–] Rubanski@lemm.ee 4 points 10 hours ago
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 72 points 18 hours ago (9 children)

Good.

Hot take but I think AI porn will be revolutionary and mostly in a good way. Sex industry is extremely wasteful and inefficient use of our collective time that also often involves a lot of abuse and dark business practices. It's just somehow taboo to even mention this.

[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 39 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Sometimes you come across a video and you are like 'oh this. I need more of THIS.'
And then you start tailoring searches to try find more of the same but you keep getting generic or repeated results because the lack of well described/defined content overuse of video TAGs (obviously to try get more views with a large net rather than being specific).
But would i watch AI content if i could feed it a description of what i want? Hell yeah!

I mean there are only so many videos of girls giving a blowjob while he eats tacos and watches old Black & White documentaries about the advancements of mechanical production processes.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago

Not to mention the users that may have a specific interest in some topic/action and basically all types of potential sources are locked bwhind paywalls.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 18 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I hate it when you find a good video, it does the job really well, so a few days later you're like, yeah let's watch that one again, you type in every single description you can about the video and find everything else but the video you want and they're barely anywhere near as good.

Hell I'd take an AI porn search engine for now, let me describe in detail what the video I'm looking for is so I can finally see it again.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 5 points 10 hours ago

Always, always download your favourite videos. Today they're available, tomorrow you don't know. (Remember the great PornHub purge? Pepperidge Farms remember)

[–] ghostfish@lemm.ee 5 points 11 hours ago

I usually just download them for this reason.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 78 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

Oh my God! That's disgusting! AI porn online!? Where!? Where do they post those!? There's so many of them, though. Which one?

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 37 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Fucking disgusting unethical shit. Tell me where to find it so I can avoid it pls.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

fuck you guys, I'm hoarding it all like the filthy perverted bad dragon I am!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago

I'm a representative of the American pornographical societies of America and I would like to educate myself and others in this disgusting AI de-generated graphical content for the purpose of informing my friends and family about this. Could we please have a link?

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 155 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

The year is 1997. A young boy is about to watch a porn video for the first time on a grainy VHS tape. An older version of himself from the far off year of 2025 appears.

Me: "You know, in the future, you'll make your own porn videos."

90s me: "Wow, you mean I'll get to have lots of hot sex!?!?"

Me: "Ha! No. So Nvidia will release this system called CUDA..."

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

I thought this was going to go Watchmen for a moment. Like...

It is 1997, I am a young boy, I am jerking off to a grainy porno playing over stolen cinemax.

It is 2007, i am in my dorm, i am jerking off to a forum thread full of hi-res porno.

It is 2027, i am jerking off to an ai porno stream that mutates to my desires in real time. I am about to nut so hard that it shatters my perception of time.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] embed_me@programming.dev 1 points 8 hours ago

Went to college

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

Oops the stream hallucinated and mutated into a horror show with women with nipples that are mouths and dicks with eyeballs.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 5 points 10 hours ago

“Nothing else excites me anymore” - 2027 you, probably

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 6 points 11 hours ago
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 25 points 18 hours ago

I am about to nut so hard that it shatters my perception of time.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 12 points 17 hours ago

I am about to nut so hard that it shatters my perception of time.

Did I stutter?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] turnip@lemm.ee 6 points 16 hours ago

Then another company called Deepseek will release a system called low level programming that replaces CUDA.

[–] oldmansbeard@midwest.social 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is going to destroy what’s left of the social fabric

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 18 hours ago
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 38 points 21 hours ago

It's really called Wanx?

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (33 children)

First off, I am sex positive, pro porn, pro sex work, and don't believe sex work should be shameful, and that there is nothing wrong about buying intimacy from a willing seller.

That said. The current state of the industry and the conditions for many professionals raises serious ethical issues. Coercion being the biggest issue.

I am torn about AI porn. On one hand it can produce porn without suffering, on the other hand it might be trained on other peoples work and take peoples jobs.

I think another major point to consider going forward is if it is problematic if people can generate all sorts of illegal stuff. If it is AI generated it is a victimless crime, so should it be illegal? I personally feel uncomfortable with the thought of several things being legal, but I can't logically argue for it being illegal without a victim.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 9 hours ago

I've found that there's a lot of things on the Internet that went wrong because it was ad supported for "free". Porn is one of them.

There is ethically produced porn out there, but you're going to have to pay for it. Incidentally, it also tends to be better porn overall. The versions of the videos they put up on tube sites are usually cut down, and are only part of their complete library. Up through 2012 or so, the tube sites were mostly pirated content, but then they came to an agreement with the mainstream porn industry. Now it's mostly the studios putting up their own content (plus independent, verified creators), and anything pirated gets taken down fast.

Anyway, sites like Crash Pad Series, Erika Lust, Vanessa Cliff, and Adulttime (the most mainstream of this list) are worth a subscription fee.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (18 children)

I think another major point to consider going forward is if it is problematic if people can generate all sorts of illegal stuff. If it is AI generated it is a victimless crime, so should it be illegal? I personally feel uncomfortable with the thought of several things being legal, but I can't logically argue for it being illegal without a victim.

I've been thinking about this recently too, and I have similar feelings.

I'm just gonna come out and say it without beating around the bush: what is the law's position on AI-generated child porn?

More importantly, what should it be?

It goes without saying that the training data absolutely should not contain CP, for reasons that should be obvious to anybody. But what if it wasn't?

If we're basing the law on pragmatism rather than emotional reaction, I guess it comes down to whether creating this material would embolden paedophiles and lead to more predatory behaviour (i.e. increasing demand), or whether it would satisfy their desires enough to cause a substantial drop in predatory behaviour (I.e. lowering demand).

And to know that, we'd need extensive and extremely controversial studies. Beyond that, even in the event allowing this stuff to be generated is an overall positive (and I don't know whether it would or won't), will many politicians actually call for this stuff to be allowed? Seems like the kind of thing that could ruin a political career. Nobody's touching that with a ten foot pole.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

what is the law’s position on AI-generated child porn?

Pretend underage porn is illegal in the EU and some other countries. I believe, in the US it is protected by the first amendment.

Mind that when people talk about child porn or CSAM that means anything underage, as far as politics is concerned. When two 17-year-olds exchange nude selfies, that is child porn. There were some publicized cases of teens in the US being convicted as pedophile sex offenders for sexting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 4 points 15 hours ago

what is the law's position on AI-generated child porn?

Already illegal here in the UK https://metro.co.uk/2025/02/02/makers-ai-child-abuse-images-jailed-uk-introduces-world-first-law-22481459/

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 151 points 1 day ago (10 children)

I am going to make this statement openly on the Internet. Feel free to make AI generated porn of me as long as it involves adults. Nobody is going to believe that a video of me getting railed by a pink wolf furry is real. Everyone knows I'm not that lucky.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 52 points 1 day ago

Fortunately, most of my family is so tech illiterate that even if a real video got out, I could just tell them it's a deepfake and they'd probably believe me.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 7 points 17 hours ago

I am looking forward to this becoming common and effective. Being able to generate animated hentai in assorted styles would be neat. Lina Inverse getting boinked by Donald Duck could be a thing.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›