this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
356 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

63614 readers
3163 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5292633

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/science by /u/calliope_kekule on 2025-03-01 05:53:17+00:00.

(page 2) 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

In my little Southern US town the lights seems to work logically and traffic flows nicely, noticeably so. I'm never sitting at a light screaming, "Oh FFS turn!" or "Why did that light change and there are no cars?!"

Traffic only gets a bit thick on the main road in late afternoons. Not much to be done there, it's a major east-west thoroughfare connecting several towns.

Have no idea how they're doing this. Sensors I'm guessing? Seems like we're too poor for fancy civil engineering like that and I'm sure we can't afford what the article talks about.

Anyone know how that might work?

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Look for a square or an X (or a square with an X in it) right Infront of the stop line for the lights. If it's there, that detects a car waiting.

There may be more of them further up the road to detect more cars waiting/arriving.

They are basically using big loops of wire to detect cars through magmatism.

They tend not to detect cyclists, so I often have to move to the side and wave cars forward so lights on side streets will change.

[–] yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Sensors on a main road and well set timers after a few months of data can do wonders and be extremely low cost, but it requires some upfront spending and enough public will to put up with bad traffic until everything is tuned.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

Sensors are cheap and have been around for a long time, but I'm going to guess the number one reason is the small part. Fewer cars = less traffic.

I've actually watched a city I visit regularly grow over about 20 years and it went from them having zero traffic to Los Angeles style traffic jams. This is despite their best efforts like making extra wide roads, using roundabouts, etc.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Oh so I don‘t have to worry about China‘s increasing emissions output because they use unhinged mass surveillance and terror against the people to put a band-aid on it. Cool…

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would be happy for sensors at traffic lights that detect whether cars are there or not. I don't consider that to be meaningful surveillance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Of course there has to be a sore loser China bad commenter with some made up BS

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

See, this is a reasonable use of horrible dystopian technology.

It doesn't excuse the rest of it, though.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›