this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
390 points (99.5% liked)

politics

20664 readers
3737 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former Social Security Commissioner Martin O’Malley warns that staffing and funding cuts under Elon Musk could cause Social Security payments to halt within 30 to 90 days.

The SSA is reducing its workforce and closing offices, prompting concerns from Democrats, who accuse the Trump administration of trying to dismantle the program.

O’Malley predicts a major political backlash if payments are interrupted.

Meanwhile, leadership changes at SSA have added further instability, with no confirmed commissioner in place.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 7 points 9 hours ago

it's only been 2 months, and already I've lost all my civil rights, my best friend can no longer have health insurance due to Medicaid cuts, and my in laws are just retired and now facing possible ss cuts. i feel like this nightmare will never end. all our lives are turned upside down.

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 8 points 22 hours ago

Elon Musk's 'efficiency' gambit risks millions of Americans' livelihoods—social safety nets aren't corporate experiments. Clear presentation of facts, though it lacks deeper analysis of potential solutions.

🐱🐱🐱🐱

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -3 points 10 hours ago

For anyone who’s confident Trump is going to cut social security, you can earn money by predicting that correctly: https://polymarket.com/event/trump-signs-bill-cutting-social-security-before-july?tid=1741193398789

[–] lazyViking@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, well, I can't read and this is all obamas fault

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I'm still not voting for Hunter either!

Can't wait to hear the complaints about how Biden is responsible for the collapse of social security.

“People should start saving now,” he urged.

How? Fucking bellend

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 6 points 22 hours ago

Hunter Biden's labtop!

[–] Zier@fedia.io 83 points 1 day ago

Just a reminder: People don't steal food. No one has ever witnessed a hungry person stealing food, that is a myth, an urban legend. It never happens. If you thought you saw someone stealing food, you were wrong and should call your eye doctor for a vision check. In conclusion, hungry people do not steal food, that's not a real thing. The More You Know.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Sorry about the needy, but for us outside the US it is high time to stock up on popcorn.

I wonder if the gun owners under the affected population will sell their weapons to buy food, or if they will use them to remedy their situation.

Maybe the number of seats needing re-election will rise next month...

[–] Feelfold@lemm.ee 11 points 20 hours ago

A few weeks ago I did the math. In my very liberal corner of the US, one egg was worth 2.002 9mm rounds, or 1.6 12 gauge shells.

In other terms, it's not cost effective to sell the guns in order to buy food.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

As an American I hate to say it but enjoy this nightmare that we're about to endure do the stupidity of the dumbest of the dumb. I don't want to see it I don't wish it on anyone but every single one of these stupid fucks who voted for this deserves exactly what they get and it's going to be horrible

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Kick ass, I hope you’re right.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 118 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If such a thing does not incite mass revolt, I cannot imagine anything ever would.

[–] afronaut@slrpnk.net 48 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Why would retired old people suddenly riot? They will call their social security rep and wait for hours on hold while they watch Jeopardy and cable news that tells them rioting is bad and only criminals do that.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Anything over 65 is "elderly", but there are absolutely a lot of people that age able and willing to cause trouble.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Between Social Security Insurance and Supplemental Income, there’s about 70 million recipients (holy wow - just shy of 20% of the U.S. population). Most of them are elderly, sure - but not all, and not all of those elderly will be infirm.

The way I see it is if these checks don’t come in April, we’ll start to see protests as the winter weather fades into spring.

I think a lot of folks feel disempowered by the system. Voting doesn’t work. And even when voting does work, the political parties seem to have their own agenda that is divorced from their purported constituents, their promises, and even reality. (Purported, because we know that voters are just the vehicle, but money is the fuel under our current system. The constituents they claim to have are not the constituents they serve.) Beyond that, they’re slapping felony convictions onto college kids who protested a genocide. Even if you want to soften the language, they were protesting violence in a nonviolent way, and they are going to have their entire lives impacted by criminal charges for expressing their ‘right’ to freedom of speech. Add in that a lot of folks are trapped in media bubbles and don’t even realize there are problems, or if they realize there are problems, they don’t really recognize their severity. And as we’ve repeatedly seen, Trump does not see justice, and there are no advocates for democracy or the rule of law. The only person that a lot of people felt was ‘on their side’ was Luigi Mangione, and failing attempts to paint him as a terrorist, the media has done their best to quash coverage of him to erase him from the national consciousness. The deck is clearly stacked in every which way.
So I mean, the consequences are dire, the impact of Trump’s actions are not yet being felt broadly or acutely enough yet, and it’s frankly kind of shitty outside, so no one wants to go stand in freezing temps, cold rain, or ceaseless winds for no gain, and incredible peril. I hate to serve up excuses, but I think the situation will have to get much worse before people are driven to action.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know specifically about elderly people, but I have heard it said that historically, people who cannot afford to eat have a higher chance of overthrowing their government.

And so it is often in a government's interest to have some sort of social programs that provide food security.

[–] afronaut@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Historically, there have been riots during the Great Depression where people raided grocery stores. But, hey, homeless people and poor single parents have been doing this for years and are called criminals for doing so.

These people will need to be okay with being considered criminals if they truly wish to riot and change things, but they’ve spent decades voting to put people who do those things in jail.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I think the moral dilemma of knowingly committing crimes is easier when your only source of income is cut.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"When you decide to be something, you can be it. That's what they don't tell you in the church. When I was your age they would say we can become cops, or criminals. Today, what I'm saying to you is this: when you're facing a loaded gun, what's the difference?"

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A lot... Trying to act like none of your life choices matter due to government BS is a sad look at life. Many of the choices you make matter, what you do matters, it can all make a difference.

[–] afronaut@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a quote from The Departed and that’s exactly what the character is saying. The Church and State present the masses with binary choices that they ultimately control. They don’t want us to know about a third choice because then we start wondering about an infinite amount of possible choices which makes the masses harder to control.

In this case, we are taught that you are either a good guy who follows the law or you are a bad guy who breaks the law; abolitionists and runaway slaves were considered criminals but slave catchers were considered “Good Guys”. Today, the lobbyists and lawmakers are trying to make it illegal to criticize the government, protest, etc. to the point where the binary view of justice starts to cave in on itself.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Damn, don't hate me but I've never seen it, so the quote went over my head, my bad. That's a damn good view on things though. I gotta make time for that one.

[–] afronaut@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago

Yea, there’s a Japanese film that came out around the same time with a similar premise that is also really good.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bring it, bitches. This is what the fucking idiots voted for, let’s go. I got a bigass bowl of popcorn.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And for everyone else that was barred from representation? This isnt going to hurt who you think it will.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (15 children)

They’re all along for the ride. Fuck you, fuck me, fuck us all. Take it out on a republican.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

You mean Nazi? I'm pretty sure they're the same goddamn thing

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

No it's going to hurt who you think it will. The collateral damage on the other hand will be absolutely horrific and unfortunate... And hurt all the other folks who don't deserve it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Will the ones not recieving their assistance understand why they are not getting it any more?

[–] griD@feddit.org 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, it will be Biden's fault. What do you think? /s

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It is funny how when Trump took office the first time, riding Obamas economy, he took credit for it. Now with his words he has started the downward trend of the stock market and now it is Bidens fault, Bidens economy.

As for the people that will be affected by the SS not coming, they will believe what they are told to believe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] politicalincorruption@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hey look, the MAGA cult is seeing if they can more directly steal our money to see if anything happens.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Well, I guess the price of eggs won't matter if they don't have any fucking money, huh?

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I really wish they do. I guarantee you people who can't pay for food or rent because they didn't get their check will exact violence on those responsible.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The fact of the matter is it’s still far, far easier to punch sideways than up.

If your child is screaming in hunger, do you plan a trip to Washington? On what time and money? Or do you grab your gun and visit the neighbor’s house to get him some food?

What’s that middle aged lady in the parking lot of the grocery store going to do if you just push her down and grab her groceries from her cart? Or even approaching grandma and gently taking the grocery bag from her hand and hopping into a vehicle before she even knows what happened.

You think your house window is a barrier? Psychological, yes, it is. Actual? Not at all.

This is where things get violent but not for the rich men in Washington because they’re not accessible.

Frankly, as someone who has studied people for 35yrs, I am bordering on an intense fear that could be likened to terror. People go for what’s easiest, in general. You all are thinking of Luigi, but he’s the exception not the rule. Most people grab what’s easiest and closest and pull from their guts, not careful planning.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think people would aim at corporations, not their communities. In a crisis, people tend to flock together and do what they can to help each other. It is elites who panic and go out of their way to 'protect' what they perceive to be theirs.

Behind the Bastards has an episode about Elite Panic.

Elite Panic: Why the Rich and Powerful Can't be Trusted

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

Here’s hoping we get the timeline right on that when (not if at this point) it happens.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›