this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
729 points (92.0% liked)

Canada

8223 readers
2825 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 18 points 18 hours ago

I hope EVs don't get a bad name out of all this. EVs are one of the few good things to come out of the last decade or so.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 67 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

i would find amusing if countries retaliate US tariffs by singling out Musk and Trump companies

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 19 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I think this is the sanest thing that has been said in the last couple of hours. I'm still recovering from the trump speech from yesterday, so not totally sure.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 28 points 21 hours ago (16 children)

I obviously don't understand the economics of it and I realize that China will always have the upper hand on price but is there a reason every western EV has to be $40,000+? Like surely it's possible to build a barebones model for less than 30k right - especially if I don't need or even want touch screens or fancy interior materials or heated seats or anything.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

Higher profit margins.

Europeans get the bulk of cheaper and smaller EVs. Meanwhile in North America, Ford stopped selling sedans. It’s a niche that car makers could fill if they wanted to.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

If I specifically don’t want touch screens, what then?

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 6 points 19 hours ago

Legally, cars sold in the US have to have a backup cam, so there has to be a screen, so it might as well be a touch screen.

I agree this is dumb and that's why I drive an old car with nothing but bluetooth

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 15 points 20 hours ago

Western culture is built on delivering value to shareholders first and foremost.

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 12 points 20 hours ago

That's why I snatched up a Bolt before Chevy (temporarily, they say) discontinued the line. I even did upgrade it a little to get heated/cooling front seats and a heated steering wheel plus the extra safety features. $32.5k with a $7.5k rebate from the federal Clean Vehicle Credit. So $25k for a car with a 175-280 mile range. (175ish in winter when the battery is less efficient, 280 in summer).

Of course the IRS fucked up the point of sale rebate when I was purchasing, but it's finally incoming with my taxes this year.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 6 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

It's a combination of issues. In no particular order;

  • precursor availability: All the stuff that EVs are made of, is made in China. If you want to build EVs it's easier and cheaper to get all the parts in China than it is in the US
  • logistics: China has more modern roads, railroads, ports etc. That makes it much easier to get parts in and finished products out
  • government aid: China has prioritized EVs for a long time and has all kinds of policies to encourage EV production
  • EV infrastructure: China has more EV charging stations than the US and EU combined
  • limited ICE competition: China doesn't have any big ICE vehicle companies. There are no significant groups in China advocating against EVs

Labor costs don't seem to be a factor at all. EVs are made in modern factories that are almost completely automated. The biggest part of "precursor availability" is likely batteries. The main innovation in EVs was the batteries. The electric motors, chassis, computers, etc are all secondary to batteries that can safely hold a lot of charge and discharge reliably. China dominates that market too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 9 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

I imagine China is subsidizing the R&D of their EVs while American car companies are trying to recoup those costs

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Every major country subsidizes R&D. That's what federal research grants are all about. The NSF, NIH, etc do exactly that.

Other US subsidies on EVs aren't specifically restricted to R&D but US companies could apply it to that, if they want.

edit: typo

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)

Why would Canadians want cheaper EVs that may or may not be reliable when they can have American assembled ones that are more expensive and may or may not work?

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 20 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Ban the fucking things.

Offer loan forgiveness to any Tesla owner. Tell musk to fuck off.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 9 points 21 hours ago

Watch the Republicans start a civil war against themselves with the people who accept the buyout vs the ones "paying their dues" to their Lord and Savior.

load more comments (2 replies)

Or maintain and drive the car you already have. There are more options then Tesla and BYD. These are probably the worst options.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 33 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Top that with copyrights removal on Tesla tech.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Copyright removal on all Disney products. Role expiry date back to puss them off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] small44@lemmy.world 29 points 23 hours ago

Why not both

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

I still want diy builds to be eligible for hov lane sticker and rebates when they have those

[–] Yoga@lemmy.ca 21 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

The argument against Chinese Ev's is not an economic one.

If some authoritarian state wants to steal from its poorest in society and transfer the wealth to foreign electric car buyers, why is our government trying to win in the race to the bottom?

Billions have been spent on the Canadian EV industry through subsidies, tax cuts and grants. The relative amount of jobs and Canada made goods are pitiful. The real beneficiaries are the foreign auto companies.

We will NEVER have a competitive advantage against China, Japan, US, UK, SK and Germany. Stop trying and put all that money and effort into something we do have a chance at being competitive in.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 16 points 23 hours ago (16 children)

It's not about being competitive against Chinese EVs, it's about preventing China from attacking us economically, politically, and potentially even digitally.

These aren't just dumb vehicles, they're running Chinese made software, for a Chinese company, and reporting data back to China.

They're not just manufactured in China like you may have with other digital devices, with the software control and data residing in more friendly nations.

That matters.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Seize all Musk and Trump-owned assets.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί