this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
768 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

64653 readers
4409 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has become so integral to online navigation that its name became a verb, meaning "to find things on the Internet." Soon, Google might just tell you what's on the Internet instead of showing you. The company has announced an expansion of its AI search features, powered by Gemini 2.0. Everyone will soon see more AI Overviews at the top of the results page, but Google is also testing a more substantial change in the form of AI Mode. This version of Google won't show you the 10 blue links at all—Gemini completely takes over the results in AI Mode.

This marks the debut of Gemini 2.0 in Google search. Google announced the first Gemini 2.0 models in December 2024, beginning with the streamlined Gemini 2.0 Flash. The heavier versions of Gemini 2.0 are still in testing, but Google says it has tuned AI Overviews with this model to offer help with harder questions in the areas of math, coding, and multimodal queries.

With this update, you will begin seeing AI Overviews on more results pages, and minors with Google accounts will see AI results for the first time. In fact, even logged out users will see AI Overviews soon. This is a big change, but it's only the start of Google's plans for AI search.

Gemini 2.0 also powers the new AI Mode for search. It's launching as an opt-in feature via Google's Search Labs, offering a totally new alternative to search as we know it. This custom version of the Gemini large language model (LLM) skips the standard web links that have been part of every Google search thus far.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 75 points 3 days ago

I am no longer feeling lucky

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago (8 children)

startpage. you're welcome.

it's also not us owned or based.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago

Startpage is owned by System1 who are based in LA.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Well you already said I'm welcome, but thank you anyway.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The future is coming and it sure looks like garbage. I have long since left Google behind.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It’s been a long time I use DuckDuckGo as my default search engine for basic stuff (which let’s be honest, more than 80% is just a simple query to find a certain area of some website, like “Firefox download Windows”, “Discord site status”, “Microsoft office pricing” etc.). If I want to search something more related to my own language or recent events in my county, Google is a must, but that’s like 10% of all my search engine usage. I don’t really need Google to know about the other 90%.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

Sounds cool, can’t wait!

[–] Majorllama@lemmy.world 85 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Would this be the same AI that spits out incorrect summarys or just flat out gets data incorrect constantly? What could possibly go wrong by making that the ONLY way to look for things going forward. Fucking morons.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

No, this will be the AI that ignores your content and just spits out sponsored content. AI doesn't really have to be involved much, but if it is, Google doesn't have to pay up when you file a class action lawsuit for misleading content because they can say "It's not our fault, thr AI did it."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] luce@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] oh_@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

AI is over hyped and doesn’t need to be shoved in our faces. Ugh.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

It’s another tech bubble like the dot com bubble. But at this point, the AI bubble, the crypto bubble, and the capitalism bubble will all crash at the same time as the world economy falls apart and we end up in another global war. I guess the accelerationists that survive will get their wish and see what remains and if it’s the neofuedalist white supremacy utopia they dream of

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

I don't need to care. I stopped using Google search months ago.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Stick to SEARCH, not making shit up (euphemistically called "hallucinating").

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I mean their search results have gone to absolute shit anyway, the AI is probably better at this point.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

My coworker who has an absolute hard-on for ChatGPT has tried several times in vain to get it to say the correct answer to a question I knew the answer to. LLMs are bullshit engines and toys for the malicious.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Absolute shit results run through an AI gives you even worse absolute shit.

[–] acutfjg@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Been using Ecosia for months now. DuckDuckGo and Startpage before that. I'm pretty happy with Ecosia search results, can't complain.

Because it isn’t perfect, but it’s good enough and my favourite now. And they are the only consumer tech company I know of having such a positive impact on the environment worldwide.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Ok, but why should I go to Google for ai answers when I can get the same from openai, other models or even local installations without all the ads?

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately this isn’t about you, but the 90% of people who don’t understand what AI is at all and don’t give a shit where the responses come from as long as “scorpio dream meaning high school teacher truck” and “can you gregnant with cousin?” Give them answers they like

/s to an extent, but here we are

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago

PREGANANANT

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is this for human beings, or is it for Google to show their investors to prove that AI is totally going to revolutionize something eventually?

Screw Google either way, I'm not going to use their search engine either way, but this doesn't feel like a product they are genuinely committed to releasing. Maybe I'm wrong, and in that case, screw them even more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Hmm, in theory I don't have a problem with an AI telling me the answer to my question or whatever I'm searching for - but this isn't a web search. If I'm actually searching for a particular page or context, then I want to be able to do that.

These are two entirely different things, and if Google goes down this route they aren't a search engine anymore - they are an LLM provider.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can it be worse than the sanitised results they give you now?

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Yes absolutely

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

The model uses "advanced reasoning, thinking, and multimodal capabilities"...

Well, LLM's are incapable of actually doing the first two, so we're already off to a great start.

I don't think it's much in the way of hyperbole to say that if they make this the default or worse, only search output option then this will be the thing that literally destroys the company.

No one except idiotic boardroom denizens actually wants this. Google failing to provide actual search results is the singular one and only thing that could actually get users to switch away from using it -- and not do that thing where they just grumble and bitch and moan but keep using it anyway. And if no one is searching on Google then nobody is seeing ads on Google, which means Google will not be selling ads.

I will laugh so hard if this happens.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›