this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
144 points (98.0% liked)

Fediverse

31473 readers
2723 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I love the fact that fediverse was built from the ground up to be free, federated and interoperable. I have two questions that may come from my lack of expertise / knowledge, so I apologise in advance if they are dumb.

  1. Bots can disrupt smaller instances:

What is stopping corpos from scraping everyone's posts and stuff from the fediverse and train their AI? What's stopping them then, to create loads of not accounts and spam / disrupt smaller communities? When an instances quality drops, the users may be more incentivised to migrate to bigger instances and go there. It's safe to say most Lemmy users are not going to spin their own instance and start communities from scratch. Meanwhile, the onslaught of bots can overwhelm these budding communities and instances.

  1. Corpos can flood the fediverse with ads and crap:

Threads comes to mind on this point and how many instances have chosen not to defederate with them. Besides, they can create bridges, and have repost bots in all instances to flood major them with ads. With generative content, it is so much easier to make a seemingly casual post about a product and mask it as an advertisement.

I've seen previous posts about people wanting to come because of their opinion about how certain countries behave. I feel the true evil are the corporates.

(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 11 hours ago

Everything posted on the public web is potential AI training data, federation is completely irrelevant to that.

The rest of your questions has the simple answer that a priori there is nothing "stopping" any of that. You should choose an instance whose admins are looking out for things like that and keeping your experience enjoyable, banning spambots or defederating from spambot farms when they are discovered.

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Threads is trying to become that. We have a list of instances blocking Threads here: https://fedipact.veganism.social/

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Reminder that LW does not block Threads.net : https://lemmy.world/instances

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fernfrost@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Well for the me reason there aren’t as many troll farms operating here in comparison to reddit. There are just not enough users here yet.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah I think that’s a big factor, we’re just not a big target and relatively obscure.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I suspect the distributed moderation will help in the long run too.

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 9 points 11 hours ago

Not much to do against scraping. On a small (but actively moderated) instance, a spamming bot will easily be detected and hopefully suspended. Generally, moderation is often better on smaller instances, so I'm not too worried about people migrating towards bigger instances - usually it's the other way round.

For 2. - dedicated corp instances will be defederated from many instances quickly. Bridge accounts on other instances need to be dealt with by the mods.

Yes, of course this can increase moderation effort. But spam accounts are way more easy to deal with from a moderation perspective than issues between real human users which usually takes wayyy more effort to deal with.

[–] kane@femboys.biz 6 points 11 hours ago

You’re potentially right, which is why for my own account I host my own instance. Which I truly understand is not for everyone.

When it comes to communities themselves, that’s a bit more difficult but I am hoping that we (the ‘inhabitants’ of the Fediverse) will ignore those attempt and actively block their instances if it does become a “threat”.

For scraping, I made this point before in a different post, but: the internets public, if we do not want to get scraped, stay in private local communities. The public nature of most communities means you’re out of luck trying to block scraping altogether.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing. Except that they don't give a shit. Fedi population is tiny and irrelevant.

Let me put it into perspective. Currently Fediverse as a whole has around 50k daily active users and 1.3m monthly active users split between multiple services with Mastodon being the most active. These are the stats for something that exists for over a decade.

I used to work in a company making some social media products. When we launched our main product we had 1m daily active users within a month and I don't remember how many monthly users (that was over 10 years ago). And it just grew from there.

Facebook Threads has 100m daily active users now. The whole Fediverse is a tiny echo chamber and no one cares or knows about its existence.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Its sad that we are so tiny but its also a blessing that we have this corner of the internet to ourselves

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 5 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Well, nothing is sad on its own, it all depends on the priorities of people behind. If the priority is to keep Fediverse small and under the radar, then everything is going great.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 11 hours ago

This in my opinion shouldnt be viewed as a bad thing. If they do then they are joining the fediverse and bringing all their walled garden content over to an open protocol. If this happens we still have the power to choose a server that does not federate with them while their users also have the choice to move to a server that better aligns with their values.

If a big tech company hosted a server and participated like a good citizen then it should be welcomed but if they federate ads then everyone would criticize them and defederate.

[–] Nadru@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

As long as it's online and public they can acces the info. But we have tools to fight back. Some instances are private unless you're a member, some choose to defederate, we can ban bots, etc

Nothing is perfect, it's always an ongoing struggle.

[–] Palladiumasteroid@piefed.social 4 points 11 hours ago

Smaller instances, being smaller are actually easier to moderate and have and easier time detecting those things than then bigger ones. Small instance many times are small, not because they're new but because they heavily moderate who can belong to their server and federate with their content.

It's the biggest instance that tend to have worst quality of moderation, thus being more at risk of things like AI scraping or bots.

There's a reason people who practically have been on the fediverse from the very beginning tend to tell you to avoid flagship and massive instances; those are a moderation nightmare, both to their own admins and to other intances' admins.

2- Most fediverse software have tool to block AI, bots and ads.

On what's stopping corporations from taking over the Fediverse....We are. Our ability to decide whom we federate with is stopping corporations from taking over.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 4 points 11 hours ago

The purpose of federation is to build a network that no one entity can control. An evil CEO can enshittify their own server, but the damage they would deal is limited to their server. The rest of the network would still exist outside of their control, and users can easily leave their server to go elsewhere.

[–] hisao@ani.social 1 points 11 hours ago

Nothing? In practice, if this were to happen on a noticeable scale it would mean Lemmy has gone mainstream. That said, within a federated system, it's entirely possible to create isolated, defederated webrings - for example, networks consisting solely of invite-based instances. If something like this becomes a necessity, it might lead to formation of multiple such webrings and they might even decide to federate with each other someday.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›