this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1223 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

70248 readers
3860 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

He's afraid of losing his little empire.

OpenAI also had no clue on recreation the happy little accident that gave them chatGPT3. That's mostly because their whole thing was using a simple model and brute forcing it with more data, more power, more nodes and then even more data and power until it produced results.

As expected, this isn't sustainable. It's beyond the point of decreasing returns. But Sam here has no idea on how to fix that with much better models so goes back to the one thing he knows: more data needed, just one more terabyte bro, ignore the copyright!

And now he's blaming the Chinese into forcing him to use even more data.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Please, let it be over. Idiotic "ai"....

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ip should solely be with the creator and not the corporation that owns that creator. A lot of problems in stems is IP held hostage by the corporations and by publishing companies of research papers

[–] RatherBeMTB@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Over in the US, that's giving China the advantage in AI development. Won't happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

Arr, matey.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Do you promise?!?!

[–] liquidthex@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago

It's so wild how laws just have no idea what to do with you if you just add one layer of proxy. "Nooo I'm not stealing and plagerizing, it's the AI doing it!"

[–] sirber@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

AI always been about using stolen stuff

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

National security my ass. More like his time span to show more dumb "achievements" while getting richer depends on it and nothing else

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Many of you are completely two-faced on copyright laws.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›