this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
603 points (99.7% liked)

politics

21970 readers
3827 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A federal judge criticized a Trump administration Justice Department lawyer who claimed they didn't have to follow the judge's oral order blocking deportations to El Salvador because it wasn't in writing.

Judge Boasberg questioned why the administration ignored his directive to return immigrants to the US. The DOJ lawyer repeatedly refused to provide information about the deportations, citing "national security concerns."

Frustrated, Boasberg ordered sworn declarations explaining what happened, quipping that he would issue a written order "since apparently my verbal orders don't seem to carry much weight."

(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 180 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Throw. That. Lawyer. In. PRISON. There may be no way to enforce the law on Trump himself, but make lawyers afraid to do his dirty work.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago

Throw everyone who implemented it in prison. Trump may have made himself an untouchable dictator but just himself.

Remember that loyalty only goes one way, unless it’s in trumps personal interest such as profiting from it. Make him go on record as either pardoning the criminals or dropping them

[–] cotus@midwest.social 42 points 11 hours ago (11 children)

Wouldn't Trump just pardon them?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I don't think he can. Courts have the power to hold people until they comply with a court order.

Technically so does congress although it's never done.

US Marshalls, however, are a real thing and work for the judiciary.

Edit: ugh, they are responsible for carrying out what the judiciary needs, but it's still part of the executive (DoJ).

[–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 9 hours ago

He can't pardon a disbarment, though!

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

No. You go through the bar and remove their license.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 164 points 12 hours ago

He didn't feel he could disregard it.

He successfully disregarded it.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 111 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

His written orders won’t do anything either. Who knew the constitution can be so easily ripped to shreds by simply ignoring it.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 60 points 12 hours ago

This should have been fixed in the 1800s when Andrew Jackson defied the Supreme Court, but it was ignored and here we are

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 81 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

☒ Soap box ☒ Ballot box ☒ Jury box ☐ Ammo box

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

Promises promises.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 45 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Uh oh! This Judge sounds PISSED! SOON Trump is going to get a STERNLY WRITTEN LETTER! And if they DEFY that? OH Boy! ANOTHER letter will be on the way!

[–] bishbosh@lemm.ee 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'd Like to See Ol Donny Trump Wriggle His Way Out of THIS Jam!

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

You guys literally got my overweight middle aged ass giggling like an imbecile in my office at work

[–] engene@lemmy.ca 63 points 12 hours ago

Enforce the law! Otherwise, there really is no turning back. US Democracy is dead. Fascism wins. 🇺🇸

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 44 points 11 hours ago

Well if the order wasn't enforced... yes?

These psychos aren't stopped by words.

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 32 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

What a strongly worded condemnation!

Anyway

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 hours ago

You should have seen the glare of severe consternation the judge cast towards the back of the exiting lawyer!!!

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 10 points 10 hours ago

And if you put it in writing, it’ll be on the wrong letterhead.

Or you didn’t sign it.

Or you signed it with autopen.

[–] Nemean_lion@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago

They don't give a single fuck about any letter you make, any protest you do. Any law you say they broke. What the fuck are you going to do about ir? Until that answer is armed revolt they will not give a single fuck about anything you do.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

Judge SLAMS Trump with no legal action whatsoever.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

So the judge is putting Trump in a cell for disobeying the law?

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago

way more than about Trump

legal precedents that uphold other legal precedents are being dismantled like they already were being done away with before Trump

more precedents that go away the more personal freedoms and civil liberties goes away

need a revolution

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›