this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
659 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

66892 readers
5085 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nectar45@lemmy.zip 14 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

Imo our current version of ai are too generalized, we add so much information into the ai to make them good at everything it all mixes together into a single grey halucinating slop that the ai ends up being good at nothing.

We need to find ways to specialize ai and give said ai a more consistent and concrete personality to move forward.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

We already did this like a year ago mate. That was like v3 of gpt

[–] nectar45@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but its like....pretty half baked

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

No, it's just not something exposed to you to see

But under the hood it very much does shift gears depending on what you ask it to do

It's why gpt can do stuff now like analyze contents of images, basic OCR, but also generate images too.

Yet it can also do math, talk about biology, give relationship advice....

I believe open AI called the term "specialists" or something vaguely like that, at the time.

load more comments (4 replies)

Take a car that's stuck in reverse, slap a 454 Chevy big block in it. You'll have a car that still drives the wrong way; but faster.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Its not a dead end if you replace all big name search engines with this. Then slowly replace real results with your own. Then it accomplishes something.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Worst case scenario, I don't think money spent on supercomputers is the worst way to spend money. That in itself has brought chip design and development forward. Not to mention ai is already invaluable with a lot of science research. Invaluable!

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Say it isn't so...

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

The cope on this site is so bad sometimes. AI is already revolutionary.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That may be true technologically. But if the economics don't add up it's a bubble.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's neither, and business majors shouldn't have voting rights as non-sapient humans.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 1 points 14 hours ago

Not that I like it. It's just how it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›