this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
136 points (94.7% liked)

Linux

54312 readers
283 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I would understand if Canonical want a new cow to milk, but why are developers even agreeing to this? Are they out of their minds?? Do they actually want companies to steal their code? Or is this some reverse-uno move I don't see yet? I cannot fathom any FOSS project not using the AGPL anymore. It's like they're painting their faces with "here, take my stuff and don't contribute anything back, that's totally fine"

(page 3) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Speaking for myself, it’s because future monetization can be easier under mit when using a foss utility and private code.

My project would not exist at all unless there were ways to make money off it.

True, others can also use that same code too, in the exact same way, but that requires quite the investment, and those of us that are doing this are banking on not getting the interest of a monopoly in that way. We are competing against other small businesses who have limited resources.

At the same time the free part can get a boost by the community.

I comment a lot in politics here, and am sometimes an ass, so cannot name this project

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Vincent@feddit.nl -1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

My rule-of-thumb is: is the licence going to make things better for users? In other words, I try to predict whether a company would just not use my AGPL-licensed code, or would potentially contribute back. If they wouldn't, I don't really care and rather my code at least gets used to build something presumably useful.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like BSDs more than GPL just personal choice

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Squeek, squack. Your opinion is whack

[–] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, but I or rather many hate your Opinion.

Its ok if you dislike my Opinion about that. But I will show you, that many dislike your Opinion with a little fun and humour.

I believe that this has nothing to do with growing up, but I think thats your opinion you can attempt to follow.

[–] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Lol even GNU and fsf failed at implementing gplv3 at all levels in Linux. And with gplv3 redhat gets awa with what they do. Also see recent agplv3 lawsuit. Gpl enforcement is real issue. If fsf wants why no create true copy left strong license no exceptions!

load more comments