this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
137 points (94.8% liked)

Asklemmy

47252 readers
720 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Where would you move to ride out a potential WWIII?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

We will know the best place after whatever event happens. It’s always hard to predict these things with so many variables.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

Somewhere I won't be bothered, like Tristan da Cunha or the Pitcairn Islands

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Chatham Islands ?

I chose Tasmania, am here now.. I dont think anywhere is but i am hoping it's lesser and i am not the literal tip of the spear.

Albiet the poulation is older, white, conservative, religious so there is that problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just click your heels together three times, Dorothy. You'll find all the fascism you need right in your own backyard!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kepix@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

if teleportation is allowed, i would just telefrag putin in moscow.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Vietnam. Decent enough government and standard of living, and they whooped America's ass so bad that it'd be political suicide to go back there. I mean, what kind of timeline would we have to be on for someone to be stupid enough to... hmm.

Considering that fucking Greenland is caught up in it now, idk that anywhere is safe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheGuyTM3@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Marquesas islands. They are very large, no dangers, lot of hideouts, lot of food resources, innaccessible for wheel vehicles, almost impossible to build large bases and to urbanise (small interest for China), they are isolated from other archipelagos, and the islands have not even 10k inhabitants in total (14 islands) so no one would get interest in nuking here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whelk@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Why should I leave? They're the ones who suck. I'm not giving any ground

[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Nomadic life makes the most sense, just figure out your mode(s) of transportation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] edel@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If we take its actual definition; far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist, countries like Cuba for sure fits the bill. Now Cuba is authoritarian (and normal since they are in permanent and genuine threat from its neighbor) and probably that is not what is in your mind. Latin America is, as many as you pointed out, no ideal... but most countries there at least lacks of a strong government to enforce things (for better or worse) so, in a turbulent world, it is indeed a better bet. I think, for the time being, Spain has proven to be resilient to authoritarianism and even the voters of "extreme" parties are not that extreme themselves! In Latin America, Mexico is proven to have an amazing leadership (today, I consider it the best worldwide) so unlikely to change overnight. Colombia, Chile and Uruguay seems promising too.

[–] marte@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

See, when we analyze Latin America countries, one cannot think exclusively in terms of US or Europe political science. Our states may seem like weak forces when scrutinized from afar, however this is exactly the problem. Fascism has different ways of spreading through institutions and evangelical militias or drug cartels are literally everywhere. Sometimes, our states do not enforce fascism by law. They are weak on surface and extremely dangerous in their militias and affiliations with drug cartels. The contradiction is the rule around here. Mexico is not the heaven you make it sound. Do not trust a country's safety based on official governments, it is a starter error when analyzing Latin America politics

load more comments (3 replies)

Exactly where I am.

I moved to a backwater town in the middle of the desert for a fucking reason, worse comes to worst and I've got the benefit of being able to travel in literally any direction and be on res.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ve got a bug out zone extremely close to a bordering country that’s self sufficient. Staying put unless things get wildly out of hand. We could probably house another 2 families if needed.

Can I call dibs?

[–] PopeyesBiscuit@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Think my home country Suriname is pretty safe. Almost no one knows it exists and there's plenty of places to ride out instability

[–] Tinks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Considering Russia's interest in the islands, that might not be all that great of a choice.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I am going to timetravel to the 1890s

[–] elric@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The dream of the 1890s is alive in Portland

[–] rivan@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

It's the dysentery, isn't it?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί