this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
1056 points (93.3% liked)

Comic Strips

16305 readers
2376 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's like Twitter and other online plataforms, where advocating or talking about violent acts is forbidden, unless you are an army or a government organization.

[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Violence is only the answer when violence is already employed and you need to defend yourself. Ukraine is allowed to be violent against the aggressor. Police is allowed to be violent against insurrectionists.

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But are the people allowed to be violent when the police use excessive force?

...cuz the cops be doing that a lot

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

But do it in a smart way. A single person using violence against someone stronger than him, is dumb.

Something like BLM movement is smart.

Just trying to resist arrest, however angry it may make you, is dumb. Unless of course you'd be sent to gulag. Then do resist.

You need to use power in a smart way to gain the upper hand.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

This ideology becomes an issue when someone is finding ways to attack you that don’t quite constitute violence.

People need food, water, shelter, sense of belonging in society, etc. Bigots have gotten very good at using whatever means they can to attack each of these without ever physically throwing a punch; defunding someone’s means of living, evicting them, harassing them, etc.

Ideally, the law, and hence the police (who hold guns) would retaliate on each of these things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, bullshit.

[–] TheFudd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Complete the following sentence:

"Live by the sword, ___ __ ___ _____."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

Even if youre acab, violence is the solution sometimes. This is a horrible argument against police. What do you do to nazis? You beat the shit out of them. See you solved the problem of a nazi being in your eyesight with violence. I myself am a fan of reformed police tho which is only used in cases like someone clearly not abiding by the law(not going to court, etc) and imvestigations(which is more like detectives and stuff not police)

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Violence is never the solution, however tolerance should not extend to the intolerant.

If you think a large nation completely dismantling its military would prevent war, you're just an idiot.

[–] missandry351@lemmings.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes I believe violence is never the solution, but since there are people out there that don’t share my ideas, I need to keep some police officers around to keep me safe and some military personal to keep my country safe.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

To keep the peace it's all or nothing. Nobody has weapons or everybody has weapons. Since the former is pretty hard to achieve, the latter must happen.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Does everybody include convicted serial killers?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments