this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
632 points (97.4% liked)

World News

45720 readers
2164 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The plan would replace the $600 million in subsidies Denmark gives the island each year

The Donald Trump administration is reportedly considering giving about $10,000 to each Greenland resident as part of its plan to annex the island.

The possibility would seek to replace the $600 million Denmark gives the territory in subsidies every year, and has stopped being mere rhetoric to become official U.S. policy, according to The New York Times.

The outlet detailed that the plan already includes several cabinet departments and that the White House's National Security Council has met several times to advance on it, recently sending specific instructions to different offices.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mPony@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is that what 30 pieces of silver is worth in this market?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago

What use is $10,000 if it destroys their economy?

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So if that's valid, could some states get bought by other countries? Hell, I bet many residents in some states would pay to have it be part of a different country.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I need some brave Canadian MP to make this kind of offer on Vermont or Michigan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago (4 children)

But a UBI would be economically unviable.

Lmao ok.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

Trump is a known liar and a thief.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

Lol, literally fucking stealing from tax payer after crashing the economy so that he can pay off a foreign country to join the scam

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago

Shut the fuck up. Enough.

Not you, MicroWave. The Republican president.

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 42 points 3 days ago

"A Trump never pays hus bills"

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

President Sundowner isn't going to do shit.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trump is notorious for stiffing people he owes money to

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 25 points 3 days ago (15 children)

Why do we need Greenland? Is it so we can easily attack Russia or something? Isn't Alaska pretty fucking close? Like what is the reason for annexing Greenland?

[–] PurpleSkull@lemm.ee 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is a shipping route opening up that would enable Asian-Europen-American trade via a about 2/3 shorter route than currently possible. It would make any route through the Suez canals or around Africa pointless. This might not sound important right now, but it would fundamentally change the fortunes of countries and reshape the world.

https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/future-northern-sea-route-golden-waterway-niche/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

For anyone who voted for Trump because your cost of living is too high... How y'all feeling about this?

Trump wants to give everyone in Greenland $10k. Where's your $10k? What the actual fuck has this guy done to help you out so far?

How is it that DOGE has to force your grandma to walk to an office for her social security because a phone line was too expensive, but Trump has money to throw $600m a year at this?

[–] imrighthere@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Nobody said per year. That 10k is so they can get the fuck off americas new playground. One time.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

WTF!!
What a moronic proposal, as it is, Denmark is helping them with much more than that each year.
Greenland only has 56.669 inhabitants, giving everyone including children would only amount to 567 million!!
In direct Regional financial support alone Denmark is sending about 600 million USD per year.
And that's apart from paying for instance police and military support.
And Greenland is tax exempt too!!

What a demeaning cheapskate offer.
I believe Greenland should have the right to decide for themselves.
But as a Dane, I find that offer insulting!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] opus86@lemmy.today 10 points 3 days ago

Trump is going with step one in the art of the deal. Try and buy it for less than it's worth.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›