this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
1246 points (98.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

22440 readers
1440 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] arotrios@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Personally I prefer my junior programmers well done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] pyre@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (14 children)

it's funny that some people think programming has a human element that can't be replaced but art doesn't.

load more comments (14 replies)
[โ€“] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

You can say โ€œfuckedโ€ on the internet, Ace Rbk.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

AI also isn't close to replacing other industries. They are both wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)

Definitely bait

[โ€“] boaratio@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah DHH is a problematic person to root for.

[โ€“] reboot6675@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

I have mixed feelings about that company. They have some interesting things "going against the flow" like ditching the cloud and going back to on prem, hating on microservices, advocating against taking money from VCs, and now hiring juniors. On the other hand, the guy is a Musk fanboy and they push some anti-DEI bullshit. Also he's a TypeScript hater for some reason...

[โ€“] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I take issue with the "replacing other industries" part.

I know that this is an unpopular opinion among programmers but all professions have roles that range from small skills sets and little cognitive abilities to large skill sets and high level cognitive abilities.

Generative AI is an incremental improvement in automation. In my industry it might make someone 10% more productive. For any role where it could make someone 20% more productive that role could have been made more efficient in some other way, be it training, templates, simple conversion scripts, whatever.

Basically, if someone's job can be replaced by AI then they weren't really producing any value in the first place.

Of course, this means that in a firm with 100 staff, you could get the same output with 91 staff plus Gen AI. So yeah in that context 9 people might be replaced by AI, but that doesn't tend to be how things go in practice.

load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] fubarx@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Thank you for your opinion.

Anyway.

[โ€“] meliante@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We're still far away from Al replacing programmers. Replacing other industries, sure.

Right, it's the others that are cooked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Tungsten5@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

I once asked chatGPT to write a simple RK2 algorithm in python. The function couldve been about 3 lines followed by a return statement. It gave me some convoluted code that was 3 functions and about 20 lines. AI still has some time to go before its can handle writing code on its own. Ive asked copilot/chatGPT several times to write code (just for fun) and it always does this

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ