I was just wondering, would immutable distros be even less affected than Unix systems in general?
linuxmemes
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
3. Post Linux-related content
sudo
in Windows.4. No recent reposts
5. π¬π§ Language/ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ/Sprache
6. (NEW!) Regarding public figures
We all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
depends.
is your bios writable?
do programs stay written to memory after cycle?
There is no security benefit with immutable Linux
Can you elaborate? Wouldn't malware need to install something which would not happen on an immutable?
Immutable distros can usually be set to mutable with the correct privileged command.
It's essentially security by obscurity. But I disagree with "no benefit". An infection miss through dumb luck is still a miss, after all.
If malware has root access it can do whatever it wants
Things like SElinux and sandboxing is what secures systems.
is that the goal with immutable distros? i thought they were primarily used for rollbacks.
if you're not at least running clamav you're gonna regret it!
What anti-virus sudo you use?
When you get to server levels it's about making sure the firewall rules are filtering correctly. Need external access for support, while blocking script kiddies attempts to gain ssh access. (Figuratively speaking)
SElinux is what you want