this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
230 points (94.2% liked)

Not The Onion

16129 readers
1251 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 12 points 6 days ago

As opposed to them intentionally dumping them in the ocean so they don't lose their budget.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago

Yet I had some moron IRL argue with me about rumors of a FEMA center blowing $200k on training, therefore it should be closed. They never bring up defense though.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago

How exactly is this "not the onion"? Stuff like this happens. No idea why this would be seen as satirical in any way.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, accidents happens sometimes. This isn't really worth worrying about.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 4 points 6 days ago

I'm right here if they want to waste another 70 million

[–] urfavlaura@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

btw at the current military budget of ~850 billion USD for 2025 they could afford to lose one of them every 42 minutes for the entire year

[–] SenatorCollins@aussie.zone 74 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Well there are a lot of these ships going around the world all the time, and very seldom does anything like this happen. I just don’t want people thinking that carriers aren’t safe.

[–] PacMan@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Also sounds like the ship was taking evasive action from hostels. They where probably bring up the bird from below deck storage and where getting it ready for the run way and the crew was not ready for the movement. I am sure training will be had from this across the fleet

[–] SenatorCollins@aussie.zone 5 points 6 days ago

Well, I was thinking more about the other ones.

[–] spizzat2@lemm.ee 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, the fighter jet's not supposed to fall off, for start.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

Well that's why they had to take it out from the environment.

"Yeah, that’s not very typical. I’d like to make that point."

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

okay, but it wasn't the front that fell off this time 😄 it wasn't even a part if the ship.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

Not safe for the houthis anyway.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Haha, they are increasing military spending. Showing that reducing the deficit is not the goal at all. They were towing the plane around the flight deck and had some mistake, the tow truck thingy went off the bridge, taking the plane with it. Seems like a design flaw somewhere. Not a big ding to the military, that's like 0.25% of the available super hornets. Sure is a dumb way to throw a few tens of millions of dollars away, but growing up around the military, I've known for decades that the military are great at throwing money out the window.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 days ago

the tow truck thingy went off the bridge

I'm not sure what to be more impressed with: that the tow truck thingy driver had bridge clearance, or that the thingy itself managed to tow a fighter jet up the island.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago

I mean nobody got hurt and nothing else seems to have been damaged. If you're gonna lose a fighter jet I reckon this is about the cheapest way to do it.

[–] badbrainstorm@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had a retired military buddy at work who told me it was one of his annual task to burn through supply, so they wouldn't lose funding. I still get amused when I think about him reinacting them spending weeks on end bored AF and snacking, while wasting millions of rounds of ammo, and tossing hand grenades

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ve heard stories of people burying entire tanks.

Funny. But also very stupid and wasteful.

[–] badbrainstorm@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So they raise the military budget, and cut all social welfare, and health funding. 🇺🇸

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

yes, but it's unrelated. the US could afford all three, but the military protects wealth, while social welfare releases the pressure on ppl to be exploited to generate wealth and health funding lowers the amount of wealth they can siphon off.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

the tow truck thingy

Ah yes, the technical term.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Houthis will count this as a downed aircraft

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

The number of combat defeats of the F-18 is somewhere in the single digits, so you gotta take what you can get.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

More like a drowned aircraft, amirite?

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] remon@ani.social 11 points 1 week ago

At sea? Chance in a million.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Idk if people are joking, but the carrier was taking fire, made a hard turn, and the jet was under tow at that moment. Since it wasnt secured it went over, thankfully not taking anybody with it

[–] houstoneulers@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Highway to the fumblezone!

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Welcome back, John McCain 🫡

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's amazingly cheap for a fighter aircraft.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Old fa18, they were cheap back then and it's not stealth or anything.

[–] zout@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks Trump!