this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
125 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23610 readers
2119 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived copies of the article:

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 weeks ago

in case you haven't caught on: the objective is NOT to save money, be more "efficient," improve anything...the objective is to reduce the functionality of the government to zero

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

A young man with no government experience who has yet to even complete his undergraduate degree is working for Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and has been tasked with using artificial intelligence to rewrite the agency’s rules and regulations.

Where are they finding these people? Why is everything in DOGE being led by the most inexperienced young people? Is it just because they're ambitious, naïve and malleable?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They're choosing people who are in the Nazi group chat and also did an internship at one of Musk’s companies.

No senior folks because more senior people won't break the law because their boss says so.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Patsys. Scapegoats. Tools.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

i’d guess some amount of dunning-kruger… find people with too much experience and they’ll say “na that’s simplistic we can’t do it”… find people juuuust experienced enough to have done basic things and they won’t know just how complex things can get

this is a very typical thing in IT: juniors almost universally try to apply schemas to the world so everything fits in a database - they assume that people always have 3 names, that addresses are simple, that dealing with time zones is trivial… reality is far more complex than that; the universe doesn’t fit in neat little boxes

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Thank God we got rid of Chevron Deference. /s /un-s

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

This is a very specific picture, but I've seen this building and appreciate its purpose when run properly. Look it up. It's a crazy building.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

Trump's administration is too stupid to think for themselves, so they're getting AI to do their thinking for them.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Think about all those asshole conservates in your lives that probably at some point in their racist lives said something like, "we just want the best person for the job." Big if true. Racist if not. Hypocritical, because I don't hear them anymore.