this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
400 points (96.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

34058 readers
567 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 36 points 3 days ago (3 children)

There's more to history than Wikipedia. Like physical books

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I didn't even think of that 🤦

I've been online for too long

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Back in my day you had to buy Wikipedia. It came in like 20 massive volumes that ate up a shelf or two.

Thinking about it… I wonder what my parents did with our copies…

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

I doubt Britanica has a page dedicated to Limp Bizkit.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

The encyclopedia even came on CD for a while. It was called Encarta. But I loved my parent's World Book Encyclopedia much more.

[–] applemao@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Still have em! They'll be the last source of actual knowledge once the AI slop destroys us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Migmog@lemm.ee 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tech bros like musk who capture companies to gut them.

[–] Migmog@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But Wikipedia isn't a company. It's a non-profit foundation.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yes, and Musk this year said he would defund and potentially disband (for being "terrorist orgs") any nonprofit he didnt like. He was kind of meaning the ACLU at the time but it includes Wikipedia too potentially for the disbanding part

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago

I mean they can try to censor it but I really don't see why the wikimedia foundation wouldn't just move shop to a different country, or a different group just starts running a mirror of it. Like it might be down for a while, at which time we would have to use mirrors, but I can't see any future where its just gone forever.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I mean every historical source is full of one sided propaganda.

Have you ever heard the phrase "history is written by winners"?

What have keep history alive is not Wikipedia. Is the fact that multiple people from multiple POV write things down and we can find and read multiple sources.

Don't get me wrong, Wikipedia is great, but it's not what keeps history more or less accurate. Take into account that Wikipedia is a sum up of other sources. In order to write to Wikipedia you must quote a primary source.

And AI really doesn't have much to do with anything here. Bad sources have existed forever, since Herodotus.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

Wikipedia citing sources is exactly what keeps it accurate. Conflicting primary sources are both considered, and the discrepancies discussed.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 14 points 3 days ago

Wouldn't it make sense to just host the website from another country, outside of US jurisdiction?

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

There are a lot of citations to things like Britannica from 1911 that is archived and public domain.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

Start downloading comrades

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›