this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
389 points (74.0% liked)

Selfhosted

46639 readers
1577 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Not liquid enough.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 17 hours ago (10 children)

Because there's no serious answers being given even though there are at least 2:

  • trees have roots, roots ruin any nearby human infrastructure. You'll note this says "in urban environments" and that there are trees nearby, so this is probably the big reason
  • trees need maintenance, which costs money. this is a stupid reason imo, but it's one nonetheless
  • algae is cool, ok?
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 50 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Algae is also more efficient per cubic meter, if I understand correctly.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 31 points 15 hours ago

Not just more efficient, vastly more efficient. Algae is 10-50 times faster at processing CO² than trees are. Some algae can be up to 400x as efficient.

It's just not as "nice" to look at, we usually associate algae with growth in unsafe bodies of water like bogs, etc. versus a nice clean pool or even a maintained pond.

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 32 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

On the other hand, algae do not produce shade, not sure if it filters atmospheric pollutants, and trees provide all sort of other services to the local ecosystem.

Maybe this invention can be used on places where trees cannot lives, but I'd still take a city with trees over a city full of green tanks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 19 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Don't forget pollen and seeds.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

Bees need pollen. We need bees and you can self host them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 15 hours ago

Practical answer, fits in places trees may not. Pessimistic answer, fits in some guys cyberpunk ass vision for what he wants his office block to look like.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 63 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

How do I self host these? I tried docker run liquidtrees it didn't work

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 7 hours ago

They're not stupid; its not in docker. Check apt.

[–] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 15 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Try

docker run liquidtrees:micro-algae

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

I think there's an alpine build too if your system has low oxygen levels

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

git clone https://aur.archlinux.org/liquidtrees.git && cd liquidtrees && makepkg
or
add https://repo.30p87.de/private/archlinux as a repo, and sudo pacman -Sy liquidtrees. Then sudo systemctl enable --now liquidtrees

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iceonfire1@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 11 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Their lifetime is also much shorter. Guess where all that CO2 goes, when they die ^^

[–] pikmeir@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I have a solution. More algae.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Fake and algae

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] termaxima@programming.dev 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think anything’s wrong with trees, but maybe we could also have some of these as well as trees ?

Replace the advertisements on bus stops with a really cool green liquid wall 😮 (but they’d have to make the glass super thick, these things tend to be vandalized from time to time)

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I don’t think anything’s wrong with trees, but maybe we could also have some of these as well as trees ?

First of all nobody is proposing to replace existing trees with that, that would be silly! AFAIU the people who created this also don't want these to be used where trees could be planted. They are outspokenly designed for already densely packed cities that are already highly polluted and hostile to trees, to start turning things around. Rebecca Watson's 6min take

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 9 hours ago

Elon musk going into the tree business I see.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Trees grow and rip up the pavement around them. I do love the canopy though

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 7 hours ago

Line the plater with steel, and this is not a problem. Bonus: trees are dwarfs and don't present risks of falling on structures in storms.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Andres4NY@social.ridetrans.it 24 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (5 children)

@ECEC Good lord the number of replies here from people whose brains have been destroyed by "planners"...

  1. Trees lower the urban heat island effect.
  2. There's plenty of room for trees in dense places, so long as "density" means efficient housing and efficient transportation rather than parking lots and stroads and single-family homes.
  3. Someone said "trees require maintenance", as if asphalt & pretty much everything doesn't require maintenance?
  4. Trees harm cars. But cars harm cars too!
[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 16 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

Trees are also essential for insects, bird and animal life in cities. They are psychologically calming for people as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

Looks more like MOSS.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 8 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Trees are FOSS. This is a fork of trees.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Good post.

Wrong community.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

A big problem with trees is roots, especially in cities with dense underground infrastructure. If there’s an actual way to produce the same amount of oxygen as a tree in a smaller space, I’m all for it. I’m honestly okay with how these look, assuming low maintenance.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Very cyberpunk

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Have you ever seen how long it takes for a tree to grow?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›