this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
120 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6549 readers
379 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No fucking duh. Recycling was always a lie. Especially single stream recycling

Plastics can be recycled... It's just never viable to actually do it

[–] knightly@pawb.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I bet it'd suddenly become very viable if nations started banning non-recyclable plastic packaging.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It wouldn't. It's like banning decomposition... Good fucking luck, you can play with it a little, but ultimately it's just not possible

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's entirely possible, governments just don't want to put in the work to prosecute plastic manufacturers.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago

What I mean to say is the recycling isn't possible. It just never worked, from the beginning the best they could do is add a little old plastic to the new plastic... You never end up with the same amount of plastic though, you always end up with way more plastic

Limiting plastic on the other hand? That's doable, we can't start soon enough

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

See, with all these sorts of "sustainable" solutions that keep us hooked on fossil fuel products, be it hydrogen, LNG, plastic recycling, carbon capture, etc., my opinion is that oil companies with their hand-over-fist profits should be the ones investing on those, not the government. If there's an oil subsidy budget, use it on that, whereas the government should be spending less climate money on climate dead-ends.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Humanity is a climate dead end. We as a species are too selfish to voluntarily establish a sustainable equilibrium.

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

EU’s CRCF forcing some guardrails on the carbon market sounds promising