this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
706 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

14543 readers
391 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 95 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] echolalia@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Fucking lol. I can't believe that shit's real and from Reuters of all places.

I couldn't find the graph on an original Reuters article (they must have gotten embarrassed and pulled it down lmao), but Business Insider still has it on their version of the article

(edit: and this is just time vs murders, not time vs gun deaths, a better statistic for this)

[–] AccountMaker@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the idea behind the graph was to make it look like blood flowing, but the execution was... not the best

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Would still make more sense if it was reversed lol

[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Look at the scale one the left.

(It’s upside down)

[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know :)

my reply was in disbelief.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I didn’t.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago

I thought at first the point was that murders had gone down because they were suddenly technically legal. The inverted scale thing is worse

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

that can't be real.... why would gun deaths go down after such a law is passed? I don't understand the world...

Edit: Oh I read the other comments. Yeah that scale is stupid.

[–] Ashen44@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

there's actually no fucking way

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 19 points 2 days ago

I almost missed the scale on the left. Almost.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago
[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

phacking p-hacking

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you torture the data long enough, hey look at how low I got my p-value.

[–] 7empest@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

Cull the outliers..... Not low enough

Transform the data.... Not low enough

Normalise the data... Not low enough

Alter the model by adding random effects... Not low enough.

The major factors showed a trend towards significance.... therefore our hypothesis was met.

Hello PhD

[–] resting_parrot@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Never trust a statistic you didn't take yourself."

[–] Schneemann@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Should be 'fake' not 'take', right?

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

History Trivia: No one outside Germany knows that "Churchill-quote" because it was made up by Nazi propaganda.

[–] Schneemann@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

After a quick search I found lots of pages that attributed it to Churchill or Goebbels but apparently there is actually no record of one of them saying it.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago

"Yes, the pronounced hammer coefficients as evidenced by these repeated indentations in the flattened curve..."

[–] doodimus@beehaw.org 8 points 2 days ago

Funny how beating a defenseless creature to death with a hammer was just seen as another everyday activity for your typical Saint.