this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
150 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38590 readers
370 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been a long time Redditor and an Apollo user for about a year. I even paid for it. The main draw for me was the lack of advertising. In the back of my head I kept thinking that it couldn't last. Reddit is losing revenue from the lack of advertising views. It didn't

To me, Reddit's sky high pricing for the use of the API is intended to kill off apps like Apollo and for its users to move to the advertising filled web site or its own app, which I've never used.

If Huffman came out and said this was a revenue move right off would everyone be as upset as they are? Are people upset because Huffman completely mishandled the move or because they got their ad free experience turned off? If Reddit had an app the same quality as Apollo only with ads, would they be OK with it. I've only used Apollo so I can't speak to the other apps.

I can't blame Reddit for wanting to make money. It doesn't make a profit. Investors have to keep pouring in money to keep it going. They're going to want to see a return on their investment at some point. Usually they cash in on an IPO, but IPO's are generally only successful if the corporation looks like it will be profitable or at least the stock price continues to go up. That's how capitalism works.

In my case, I probably would have left regardless. I can't stand adds in my feed. I probably wouldn't have heard of lemmy or kbin if there hadn't been such an uproar. So I'm glad it went the way it did.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Breakpr0d@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think it is within the company's right to revenue increasing opportunities. That said I view the slandering of the Apollo creator as the turning point. It was very poor taste and their communication around this has been horrendous. It kick started the migration to the fediverse and a critical mass has adopted it. So now there is no good reason to go back to Reddit even if they reverse their decisions. Heck, had there been a different stimulant to fediverse adoption without any missteps from Reddit, I would still have transitioned my usage to a system where the users are more in control.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

IMO the issue that people are upset about, and as a result all the publicity going on, is just related to how much they wanted to charge people for the API.

If they rolled out something reasonable for pricing, and allowed people to use their own individual API keys in third party apps on a free tier, I think a few would have complained here and there, but otherwise it would have been fine.

Obviously they need to make money to pay for costs of running things somehow, there's nothing wrong with that.

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And how little time they were giving. And quite frankly, the incredible entitlement spez has shown in the wake of the incident. As if he built the whole of reddit and all its content without decades worth of free hours from users and mods alike.

He doesn't want to build a platform for communities. He and his company want personal enrichment he already feels entitled to. He's making that pretty clear. Otherwise, IPO tomorrow and use it as a cash infusion rather than a liquidity event.

[–] lanbanger@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Let's not forget that they also nuked NSFW content on the API, which is at least 50% of the uproar. Nobody likes to mention it, but it's a big reason that a lot of people use Reddit.

[–] static@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Reddit killed internet fora. By being easier and cheaper, while making no profit.

If they suddenly do want to make profit?
The terms change, there are alternatives.

[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I agree. They built a better mouse trap and now they want to go back to the old one because they figured out they can sell cheese. The better mouse trap still exists.

[–] patchw3rk@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I'm not entirely sure why Reddit was going to charge outlandish fees for the third-party APIs. Looks like none of the apps are actually going to pay them, so he's not getting anything out of it. It's really a combination of pushing them out of the market and then being a smug little bitch that really nailed it in the coffin for a lot of people.

[–] ZealousIdeaPool@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Looks like none of the apps are actually going to pay them, so he's not getting anything out of it.

But that is exactly what his goal was. If he really was interested in working with the 3PA devs, this would have been handled completely differently. The fact that it was handled as it was, with essentially zero engagement between the company and the community, and with essentially zero flexibility on the part of the company on the implementation, is pretty clear evidence that their goal all along was to drive the 3PA's out of business.

[–] tikitaki@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

i don't think they were trying to make money off of the API changes. like others are saying, it has to do with AI and they figured they might as well take the chance and knock out 3rd party in the same swoop so that they can funnel more people onto the official app

they can data harvest much better that way

[–] QHC@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

AI has nothing to do with it other than a convenient, topical scapegoat.

[–] SpaceCadet2000@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

It would have been perfectly possible to charge a different rate for AI harvesting than for Reddit Apps.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] deong@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

They don’t want the developers to pay anything. They want the developers gone so that all the users are monetizeable through ads.

[–] s_s@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Every user they lose they'll replace with 10 bots.

This isn't about longterm thinking, this is a push to control how many "users" they can put on their IPO docs. Steve and the current board (VC monies) are going to cash out and what happens to Reddit after the IPO is the least of their worries.

Every fewer third-party app is one fewer datum that they are lying about the number of real, fleshy users. This has nothing to do with AI training or APIs or anything but legitimizing bot activity to pump up the numbers.

Facebook and google have been selling ad "impressions" to people of questionable realness for decades at this point.

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 1 points 2 years ago

To get rid of the promoted and ads on the reddit website I started using https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/reddit-ad-remover/cgipdekhdobcdhnobaimhlapmhpgdpjl

[–] Scio@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

That is exactly what he said. It's just not remotely what he intended. Bad faith etc.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›